| | |

What does Megan Frampton want? A smart man.

tDGtCBIf I have any type beyond the physical, it is that the guy be smart. As in smarter than me, smarter than everyone in the room, but not a jerk about it. I want someone who knows things, who craves knowledge, who is delighted to share his arcane bits of ephemera floating around in his brain with me.

Of course, since many of us are working out our issues through our writing, and I am no exception, I will say that my dad was one of those guys. But he needed to know, and have everyone else know, that he was the smartest guy in the room (he usually was, too, but he could also be the jerkiest about proving it). In my fictional scenario, the smart guy in question is so confident in his smarts that he just needs to show he’s worthy of me.

And that, in its essence, is what good romance does—proves that each of the two protagonists are worthy of one another, even if they are not necessarily worthy at large to the world. The romantic world is a microcosm between two people (I am excluding ménage et al, since I don’t write that, and I wouldn’t feel confident I could speak with authority on what it wants to do). Those two people, by the end of the book, believe that only through being with the other one that they are complete, or stronger, or whatever their ultimate life-goal is.

Now, this makes it sound as though I’m writing super-weighty stuff, and I will be the first to admit that I do not. I write mistoricals, books that are set in history but are not always true to the period. But my characters (at least according to me) are universal for any time period, so they can act and react and generally behave as people would now, because love is love and being anxious about another person might feel the same two hundred years ago as it does today. That’s what I responded to when I read my first historical romances, especially Anya Seton’s Katherine and, somewhat less proudly to admit, Kathleen Winsor’s Forever Amber. I got so much interesting history as I was inhaling the romantic elements of those books, and the Barbara Cartlands I glommed that it was a natural thing for me to write historicals when I decided to try my hand at writing.

And my characters—because I had to return to my original point sometime—are hopefully smart in some ways, even if they’re not smart in all the ways. For example, Marcus in The Duke’s Guide to Correct Behavior is very aware of his own limitations, and how he has been altered by his upbringing. I don’t think many characters, much less heroes, are as sensitive to what made them be the way they are as Marcus is. Lily is more traditionally book-smart (she’s a faux governess, after all, but pretty good being that she’s faux and all), but she is also savvy about the world, and is smart enough to take charge when the situation demands it.

And my point? Well, I don’t have much of a specific point, but that’s kind of like my books—they ramble around for awhile, and things happen, and you (hopefully) meet interesting people, and then you get that sigh of satisfaction at the end (again, hopefully).


Megan Frampton is the author of five historical romances. She is a member and President of the Beau Monde (2004-2005), the Regency chapter of the Romance Writers of America, and a member of the NYC chapter of the RWA as well.

guest

12 Comments
newest
oldest most voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Elizabeth Williams
Elizabeth Williams
Guest
12/04/2014 3:39 pm

Love smart heroes but unfortunately there aren’t enough of them in the romances I read. My favorite hero is Earl of Ferrin from Jo Goodman’s One Fobidden Evening. I would love to hear of other intelligent but not obnoxious heroes. I will definitely check out The Dukes guide to Correct Behavior.

Dabney Grinnan
Dabney Grinnan
Guest
Reply to  Elizabeth Williams
12/05/2014 9:53 am

I love Ferrin. That Goodman is so under known. I also love Jonas Grantham in Courtney Milan’s A Kiss for Midwinter.

Dabney Grinnan
Dabney Grinnan
Guest
12/04/2014 8:21 am

Blackjack1:
Yeah, I would put the smart man up their very high on my list of favorite character traits in a romance. Higher even though is the smart man that values the smart woman! What strength of character and self-confidence for a man to thrive in a relationship with a woman of his equal in intelligence. Now that is sexy!

I said just that to my daughter last week. If there’s one thing I want for her out of romantic love, it’s for her to find a man who openly values her brains.

Blackjack1
Blackjack1
Guest
Reply to  Dabney Grinnan
12/04/2014 4:43 pm

What a great gift to offer your daughter in life!

Blackjack1
Blackjack1
Guest
12/03/2014 3:49 pm

oops, typo – “”up there,”” instead of “”up their”” – morning coffee needed :)

Blackjack1
Blackjack1
Guest
12/03/2014 3:49 pm

Yeah, I would put the smart man up their very high on my list of favorite character traits in a romance. Higher even though is the smart man that values the smart woman! What strength of character and self-confidence for a man to thrive in a relationship with a woman of his equal in intelligence. Now that is sexy!

maggie b.
maggie b.
Guest
12/03/2014 1:28 pm

Megan:
Thanks for having me, AAR folks! And Maggie, one of my future books is based on Benedict’s Sherlock (I named him “Benedict” in my working synopsis, but I think that will have to change).

I’ll definitely have to read that. :-)

Megan
Megan
Guest
12/03/2014 12:11 pm

Thanks for having me, AAR folks! And Maggie, one of my future books is based on Benedict’s Sherlock (I named him “”Benedict”” in my working synopsis, but I think that will have to change).

Dabney Grinnan
Dabney Grinnan
Guest
Reply to  Megan
12/04/2014 8:19 am

He’s sexy but a bit too quirky for me. That said, I’d be interested to see what you do with him!

maggie b.
maggie b.
Guest
12/03/2014 12:08 pm

I like intelligent characters in my romance novels too. Right now Benedict Cumberbatch’s Sherlock is my dream hero – smart and dreamy, what more could a girl want?

Sheri Cobb South
Sheri Cobb South
Guest
12/03/2014 10:46 am

Hooray for smart guys! My dad is usually the smartest guy in the room, too–he’s a retired NASA engineer, and very proud of the fact that he helped put a man on the moon using nothing more than a slide rule. (Thankfully, he’s not “”jerky”” about it.)

I ended up marrying a research chemist, and a good thing, too: if I’d married a guy and later realized that I was smarter than he was, I probably would have ended up killing him. ;-) My husband says that, if the two of us were given IQ tests, I would probably beat him hands down–and he’s not the least bit troubled by that. Ah! The best of both worlds: intelligence and nonjerkiness, all rolled into one 6’5″” frame!

LeeB.
LeeB.
Guest
12/03/2014 9:54 am

Looking forward to reading your book Megan!