TEST
First, a bit of backstory. Months ago, I optimistically requested The No-Show on Netgalley. I was thrilled (and surprised) when I received a notification that my request was accepted. To be honest, I requested The No-Show because it was an O’Leary book, and not because of anything I knew about the story. As usual, I intended to read the book blurb before I started reading the book and figured I would be fine. Alas, there was no book blurb included! Since I’m too cheap to pay for a cruise internet package (the prices are ridiculous!), I went into The No-Show totally blind. I’m so glad I did.
About halfway through the book – which I couldn’t put down once I started reading it – I was convinced O’Leary had written a thriller and not a romance, and that there was a villain who was due a major comeuppance. And I was here for it (the thriller and the comeuppance!)! I was even tempted to ask my travel buddy/internet package owner to look it up on Goodreads so I could read the blurb and see if I was right, but I resisted. Again, I’m so glad I did. Because the payoff – as you reach the final chapters and O’Leary masterfully weaves the disparate PoV threads together – is satisfying on so many levels! Heartbreaking. Romantic. Complicated. Friends, the word extraordinary comes to mind! The No-Show isn’t technically a thriller or a romance (although there are two HEAs in it), and the ending may leave you in tears. Happy tears! Sad tears! Label shmabel! I loved The No-Show any way you classify it. It’s definitely on the short list for my favorite book this year.
Okay. So how to talk about this tricky novel without any spoilers? I’ll start with the three women who narrate the story.
Siobhan is a wealthy, ambitious and quick-tempered life coach. After the abrupt and emotionally devastating end of her last relationship, Siobhan (Shiv to her two closest friends) has little faith in love or happily ever after. Shiv only does casual relationships, and she’s always the first to bail when any of her lovers begin to get too close. But on this particular morning, Shiv is at a trendy café waiting for Joseph. She usually meets Joseph at a hotel for sex once a month (on work trips from her home in Dublin to London). They don’t date and they definitely don’t meet at trendy cafés for breakfast, and she’s trying not to read too much into the date or the holiday. (It’s Valentine’s Day.) It’s too late. Shiv likes Joseph too much already, and deep down she’s hoping the breakfast date is a sign he wants more from her, too. Except Joseph is late. And Shiv is pissed. The café is annoying, a customer has just dripped coffee on her expensive dress, and Joseph is a no-show. Relationships are not for her – and now, neither is sexy, handsome, funny Joseph. Shiv leaves the cafe determined never to speak to him again. She blocks his number. Shiv doesn’t forgive. She forgets.
Miranda is a tree surgeon who loves her job. After spotting a group of tree surgeons at work one day as a little girl, she attended a workshop to learn how to safely clip on and climb up – and she’s been hooked ever since. When we meet her, she’s nervous. Today is her first day working with a new – all male – crew, and she’s worried about making a good first impression. But when Jamie, the team leader, shows up and introduces her to his motley crew, Miranda stops worrying. Miranda has always been comfortable spending time with lads – and ladies – and the crew immediately makes her feel welcome. She ignores the slow once-over AJ – a renowned ladies’ man – gives her, and listens as Jamie gives out the daily assignments. He sends her up into a tall oak, and once she’s up in the tree with her chainsaw, Miranda is wholly focused on the job at hand. The job is dangerous, and when Miranda is up in a tree, nothing else snags her attention. She finishes early – reminding Jamie she has a Valentine’s Day lunch to get to. He waves her off and after she rebuffs AJ’s invitation to meet up for a drink, she heads out. Miranda is happy with her handsome and clever businessman boyfriend, Carter. She isn’t quite sure how she and Carter – total opposites – wound up together, but she knows she’s falling in love with him. Unfortunately, after changing at a nearby McDonald’s and arriving early (and underdressed) for their lunch date at the fancy restaurant Carter selected, she’s forced to admit she’s been stood up. Miranda can’t believe it. She checks her phone for messages, again texts Carter to ask where he is, and heads home. Miranda is annoyed – angry even, but she’s certain there’s a good reason Carter was a no-show.
Jane works as a volunteer at a local charity shop. She likes routines and keeps her life simple – stopping in the same café every morning; ordering the same item (even though she really wants a cinnamon bun); wearing the same clothes on the same days every week – and she’s convinced she’s unlikeable and unloveable. (Reader, we aren’t sure why Jane is so determinedly alone, and we won’t find out until this story is nearly over). On this particular night, Jane is at a colleague’s engagement party and is trying to avoid conversation with another volunteer, Keira, by steadily eating through the hors d’oeuvres. If her mouth is full she can’t talk, and she definitely can’t tell any more lies. Which she hates doing. Unfortunately, Keira kept trying to play matchmaker and Jane had to make up a fictional boyfriend. She knows Keira is going to ask her why she’s at the party alone, so she’s doing everything she can to avoid her. This wasn’t supposed to happen, though. Joseph Carter was supposed to be her fake boyfriend. But he’s a no-show. Jane knew he was too good to be true. Ever since the handsome stranger introduced himself one morning (after asking why she just didn’t buy the cinnamon bun she clearly wanted), she’s been waiting for him to realize she isn’t worth his time. When he offered to accompany her to the party, she was relieved but nervous. She isn’t surprised he’s a no-show. Jane doesn’t deserve a great guy like Joseph Carter. Oh, Jane!
Oh, reader! WHO IS JOSEPH CARTER?! Well, I’m not going to tell you! Let’s just say Clueless Em™ finished these opening chapters convinced a Very Bad Man somehow linked these three, but unsure if it was the same person. And it took her way too long to realize Joseph and Carter are Joseph Carter! You’re welcome. But that’s all I’m going to say about him and this story. Suffice it to say, there is a MAJOR plot twist and it completely caught me unawares. Don’t try to guess; wait for it. It’s excellent.
Fortunately, although I can’t tell you much about the plot, there are lots of other great bits. If you like a clever story, this one is a banger. If you aren’t afraid to cry, get your tissues handy. And finally, the supporting cast is brilliant. O’Leary loves great friendships, and Siobhan, Miranda, and Jane are supported by some of the best friends ever. Their friends – their found families, really – are encouraging and loving, supportive and kind and good, and they add so much richness to this story. These are the kind of people you want in your corner.
Wow, I wish I could tell you all about this book. I can’t. You just have to trust me. It’s great. One of the best of the year, and probably my favorite O’Leary book. So far.
Buy it at: Amazon, Audible or your local independent retailer
Visit our Amazon Storefront
Grade: A
Book Type: Women's Fiction
Sensuality: Warm
Review Date: 12/04/22
Publication Date: 04/2022
Recent Comments …
Yep
This sounds delightful! I’m grabbing it, thanks
excellent book: interesting, funny dialogs, deep understanding of each character, interesting secondary characters, and also sexy.
I don’t think anyone expects you to post UK prices – it’s just a shame that such a great sale…
I’m sorry about that. We don’t have any way to post British prices as an American based site.
I have several of her books on my TBR and after reading this am moving them up the pile.
Just finished monthly book club and this was the pick we discussed. Universal thumbs up (4 A’s and one A-). If you’re on the fence, maybe those scores will give you the push you need to buy it.
And if you read it and liked it and are maybe looking for another author with a similar voice (and with the same mix of WF & CR), I’m listening to Who’s That Girl, by Mhairi McFarlane right now (and planning to review it here) and loving it. Planning to listen/binge her back catalog, too.
My sister-in-law just read it and LOVED it!
I finished the book today and, while I thought it was well-written, I felt that without the two “surprise twists” toward the end of the book there really wasn’t much of a story. The characters of the three women were well-delineated and individualized, but Joseph (before or after the twists) was a bit of a cypher. In a very odd way, THE NO-SHOW reminded me of the movie “The Crying Game”: the whole enterprise seems to revolve around the twist
I was very curious to know what you’d think of it in the end, and I largely agree with all of this – I was here for the slice of life stuff with the female central characters but Joseph is just…bleah.
Thanks for weighing in DDD. It’s always interesting to get a few more perspectives.
I must confess: yesterday, I said this book would be a hard pass for me, but after reading the two different takes on it here, plus the review at SBTB, I found myself feeling more intrigued about it. When I checked my library’s website, there was only one hold on the book, so I went ahead and put a hold on it. So I hope to read it shortly. Ah well, as Walt Whitman put it, “Do I contradict myself?/Very well, I contradict myself.” Lol
Please let us know what you think!
Hi DDD! I did read your comment on our other review and I was tempted to reply to it, but thought (hoped) you would read mine, too, and maybe give it another chance. TBH, none of the adjectives you used in your initial comment apply to Joseph. (IMO). I wouldn’t say he’s my favorite romance hero – and there’s a secondary male character in this one that I loved A LOT and who plays a pivotal role in the second half – but Joseph definitely isn’t the villain I assumed. He’s got some stuff, don’t get me wrong, but his characterization is challenging.
I don’t want to trigger more comments for revealing too much, so I’ll stop here. And if you haven’t, definitely don’t read the WOW spoiler in these comments.
I am so glad you are giving it another chance & I hope you like it. I loved it (obv) and am planning to listen to it, too!
I loved this book so much. What I didn’t say in this review is that the principal characters are also terrifically realized, and that the author takes you on an amazing – surprising – journey. I couldn’t put it down.
Thank you for ruining the book for me. Why didn’t you put your last sentence under a spoiler marker? I’m definitely not going to bother buying it now.
I think Em was trying to reassure readers. That said, we took your point and put her comment in a spoiler. Thank you!
The revelation that there isn’t ‘really’ any infidelity going on in The No Show ruins the book’s fourth act and it should have never been posted by a reviewer without a spoiler marker. Since the book was already ruined for me I looked up spoilers for the book and what I found confirms that. She might as well have jumped into the comment section and shouted HEY DO YOU KNOW SIOBHAN DIES IN THIS BOOK? OH AND JANE ENDS UP WITH JOSEPH AND MIRANDA GETS TOGETHER WITH AJ!
It’s disappointing and unprofessional.
We have lots of readers for whom cheating is a no go. It was a tough needle to thread here and I think Em did her best.
I’m sorry Em’s review didn’t work for you. She’s a stellar reviewer and I’ve almost never gotten a complaint about her work.
My problem wasn’t her review but the reckless spoiler in the comments. The review is fine.
If spoilers are your concern, this unnecessarily rude and aggressive comment did more to spoil the book for me than the well-written review.
Poor baby. You’ll survive.
At AAR, we ask that you criticize what people have said rather than the people themselves. Your comment is a bit more personal than I’d like. Please, going forward, stick to talking about ideas and not people.
Thanks!
OK
Your comment does exactly the thing you criticised Em for doing, so I’m putting all of it under a spoiler tag.
OK
There are a variety of ways to make a point. What matters is which one we choose to use.
For example, you could have said:
“I’m really glad you loved this book, but your comment gives too much away – at least for me. To the point I won’t bother reading it, actually. You might want to consider putting these details under a spoiler tag.”
Are you actually trying to preach to me about tone policing because I didn’t play nice with someone who spoiled a book I was looking forward to reading?
No wonder the comments section here is dead.
Dead? Harsh. And, I think, not really true.
If it is true, however, if the case is because we do stress playing nice, I can live with that.
Again, we are sorry you were spoiled and we worked to fix it. #doingourbest
In a word? Yes.
I’m all for starting with nice. Starting with nice presumes that no one was deliberately trying to ruin anyone’s reading experience, to err is human, and we appreciate the many UNPAID hours all the VOLUNTEERS put into creating the content that is AAR.
If a very general trigger warning like “there is no cheating between characters” is enough to “totally ruin” a book for you, I suggest that you not click through to the full reviews until you’ve already read the books. Trigger warnings are regularly included in reviews and comments at AAR, at the express request of many AAR readers.
I’m guessing you work for AAR . Either way you’re not doing yourself or AAR any favors by attacking a grown person how to comment on the internet. She feels the book was ruined for her and to be fair, that was a huge spoiler. You don’t get to dictate how people feel or speak. This entire thread leaves a bad taste in my mouth towards AAR. Stop passively aggressively encouraging this nonsense .
We definitely viewed this one differently, Em (no matter what O’Leary did I just could not warm up to Joseph and kept right on hating him), though I think we can agree on one thing – the cover and ad copy for this book might be the most misleading of the year thus far! Lighthearted this one rarely is.