In 2000, our readers loved….
Twenty years ago, these are the books AAR readers picked as the best of the year….
(a column from March 1, 2001)
2001 Annual Reader Poll
(For 2000 Releases)
Post to the Potpourri Message Board
Best Romance Novels
- Favorite Romance of the Year :– Winter Garden by Adele Ashworth
- Honorable Mention :– Welcome to Temptation by Jennifer Crusie
- Favorite Funny :– The Viscount Who Loved Me by Julia Quinn
- Honorable Mentions :–Welcome to Temptation by Jennifer Crusie , Mr. Perfect by Linda Howard
- Most-Hanky Read :– The Unsung Hero by Suzanne Brockmann
- Honorable Mentions :– Winter Garden by Adele Ashworth , Where Dreams Begin by Lisa Kleypas
- Most Luscious Love Story :– A Secret Love by Stephanie Laurens
- Honorable Mention :– Winter Garden by Adele Ashworth
- Favorite Cabin or Road Romance :– Winter Garden by Adele Ashworth
- Honorable Mentions : – A Game of Chance by Linda Howard , First Lady by Susan Elizabeth Phillips
- Favorite Medieval Romance :– By Arrangement by Madeline Hunter
- Favorite Regency Romance :– A tie between :- A Grand Design by Emma Jensen , Falling for Chloe by Diane Farr
- Favorite European Historical Romance :– Winter Garden by Adele Ashworth
- Honorable Mentions :– Where Dreams Begin by Lisa Kleypas , A Secret Love by Stephanie Laurens , The Viscount Who Loved Me by Julia Quinn
- Favorite American or Western Historical Romance :– I Do, I Do, I Do by Maggie Osborne
- Honorable Mention :– Never Love a Cowboy by Lorraine Heath
- Favorite Contemporary Romance :– Welcome to Temptation by Jennifer Crusie
- Honorable Mentions :- The Unsung Hero by Suzanne Brockmann , Mr. Perfect by Linda Howard
- Favorite Series/Category Romance :– Get Lucky by Suzanne Brockmann
- Favorite Romantic Suspense : – Mr. Perfect by Linda Howard
- Favorite “Other” Romance : – The Star King by Susan Grant
- Honorable Mentions :– Dark Magic by Christine Feehan , Dark Challenge by Christine Feehan
Best Characters
- Most Tortured Hero :– Michel Des Anges from Robin Schone’s The Lover
- Honorable Mentions :– Thomas Blackwood from Adele Ashworth’s Winter Garden , Gregori from Christine Feehan’s Dark Magic
- Feistiest Heroine :– Jaine from Linda Howards’ Mr. Perfect
- Favorite Hero :– Roarke from J.D. Robb’s Judgment In Death and Witness In Death
- Favorite Heroine :– Eve from J.D. Robb’s Judgment In Death and Witness In Death
- Honorable Mentions :–Kate Sheffield from Julia Quinn’s The Viscount Who Loved Me , Syd Jameson from Suzanne Brockmann’s Get Lucky
- Favorite Couple :– Eve and Rourke from J.D. Robb’s Judgment In Death and Witness In Death
- Favorite Villain :– Colin from Linda Howard’s Mr. Perfect
- Honorable Mention :– Lord Carr from Connie Brockway’s McClairen’s Isle: The Ravishing One
- Most Annoying Lead Character :– Zanita from Dara Joy’s High Intensity
- Favorite New Author :– Madeline Hunter
- Favorite Buried Treasure/New Discovery :– Suzanne Brockmann
- Honorable Mentions :– Adele Ashworth , Gaelen Foley , Kathryn Shay
- Author Most Glommed (collected during 2000) :– Suzanne Brockmann
Worst of the Year
- Author You Gave Up On :– Jayne Ann Krentz/Amanda Quick
- (Dis-)Honorable Mention :- Catherine Coulter
- Author Others Love that You Don’t :– Nora Roberts
- (Dis)-Honorable Mention :- Danielle Steel
- Most Disappointing Read :– High Intensity by Dara Joy
- Worst Read :– High Intensity by Dara Joy
- Purple-est Prose :– The Lover by Robin Schone
Somewhat loosely related, books I still love that I loved in 2000:
Roberta Gellis books have been recently put back on Amazon in kindle format, and are free on KU. Many had disappeared a while back.
if anyone is interested.
Thank you so much for helping me find the gem that is Winter Garden. Not sure how this book had escaped me thus far. A wonderful story with a memorable hero.
I wonder how well Welcome to Temptation holds up.
Also, Dillie Tucker is now old enough to get her own book. This needs to happen.
I think I’ve read 10 of the 2000 list, in contrast to 6 read + 1 DNF from the 2020 list.
I have a strong bias toward reading recent releases, which conflicts with refusal to pay prices I consider inflated (e.g., ebooks over $10), so a lot of my reading is current year or just a year or two old. After that, a lot of books sink into the background and only get read when something brings them to mind. (E.g., my 2020 reading log has 131 entries from 2020, 65 from 2019, 38 from 2018, 21 from 2017, etc.)
For points Nan mentioned, these are links to long posts that I originally wrote for the old message boards and later archived:
About errors: http://www.ccrsdodona.org/markmuse/reading/rightword.html
About a separate category of historical, see the list of levels of historical accuracy in: http://www.ccrsdodona.org/markmuse/reading/genrelabels.html
I’ve never given up on Krentz/Quick/Castle. In fact, before pandemic restrictions ended my physical bookstore visits, she was the only author I was still buying in print rather than ebooks only. (I used credit card points to get her books in hardcover.)
We should run this again at the end of the year, it’s fun.
I think it means something that I’ve read 9 of these books from 20 years ago but only 2 of the books on the list for best of 2020, although I’m not sure exactly what that meaning is. As is often the case, I loved some of the books others loved but didn’t love some of the ones that were favorites with other readers. So many of the authors on the list above haven’t had a new book in years, and I miss them. Don’t know if it’s because their muse deserted them or they could no longer get published.
My reaction was much the same – many of the authors/books on the 2000 list I read and remember (often with fondness) and I have read nothing from the 2020 list. Am I getting jaded? Or has the evolving world of romantic fiction gone in directions that don’t attract my interest? Am I getting old? Am I too picky? I really don’t know. I find myself narrowing down my selections these days very, very carefully and looking into (and rejecting) categories/sub-genres. And I find I am re-reading old favourites more and more. Some authors will see me to the grave like Georgette Heyer or Mary Balogh. Others I read for the first time and find them so tedious, so poorly written, so inane and full of things that annoy me (e.g. inaccuracies or 21st c characters in 18th or 19th c costume) that I just give up with a resounding DNF. I am making more and more permanent deletes from my kindle these days. I will always read romantic fiction but feel overwhelmed by the sheer numbers of authors that have proliferated in the last 20 and dismayed that so few of them become auto-buys. It’s becoming harder and harder to find authors that I can settle down with and learn to love. Maybe it is self-publishing? Maybe someone has the answer; I don’t.
I think many of us are in the same situation as you and Susan. I know I would try any author and read anything years ago looking for a good book. Now many decades into my love of romance I simply am tired of doing the legwork. It’s rare for me to commit to a book unless it’s getting great reviews and feedback.
It’s one reason why I love AAR so much. I need dependable reviews for me to sort my buying and library requests. While I still read a great deal, I don’t have time to waste on books that aren’t well written or are plain silly.
Like you both, I have old favorite authors I keep going back to. I am sure a good part of my opinion is my age but also it’s hard now to come up with “new” things in romance that aren’t just new for the sake of being new. I can’t think of a genre or angle that hasn’t been written about yet. We were lucky enough to be reading when things were changing in real time and romance really was being reinvented. Now with all the self publishing (which is a good thing) it’s like going from UHF TV to cable trying to absorb all the stations and choices.
…so tedious, so poorly written, so inane and full of things that annoy me (e.g. inaccuracies or 21st c characters in 18th or 19th c costume)
The inanity in HR is definitely proliferating as authors scramble to try to find “exciting” plots for their heroines to become enmeshed in. And it seems that many HR authors have become/been made to feel uncomfortable with presenting at least a semblance of historical accuracy (and I’m not talking about all the hot, fit young dukes that abound, or the fact that people have better personal hygene in HR than in reality!) Decent 18/19 Century HR seems to be going the way of the medieval, which has largely died a death, I suspect due to the fact that the mindset is so very far removed from what many readers find acceptable today.
I’m really looking forward to querying the historical romance I’ve almost finished, where the hero is of South Asian descent (#ownvoices) and another man makes racist remarks to him, yet the other man has a reason for doing so, is not an unredeemable jerk, and is being set up as the hero of the sequel. I predict rejections all around. :)
I’m sorry to say I have the same prediction, Marian. But I hope we’re proven terribly wrong. Romancelandia needs more nuanced, realistic portrayals of historical fiction characters who come alive as believable members of their time period and location. If you’ve read my rant below, that’s basically what I’m trying to get at. Of course, I’m just preaching to the choir with you. ;-)
If you don’t mind my asking, how many HR manuscripts have you written now? You’re inspiringly prolific. Hang in there!
How many historical romances? Let’s see… one novella published by Samhain. Of my unpublished HR manuscripts, this will be the fifth. It’s a good thing I’m prolific, because if I only managed a book every few years, I’d be dead before I was published again!
That’s super depressing. Very few people are heroic all the time and to limit love stories to those who are will mean that ordinary people don’t see themselves modeled as worthy of love.
This is exactly how I feel. The racist remarks are in the context of a bitter argument between the hero and the other man where the hero throws the other man’s alcoholism in his teeth, so the other man hits back with what he sees as the hero’s weak point (concern that the heroine’s attraction to him is due to fetishization of Asians).
Towards the end, though, they have to work together to stop the villain and they get over their differences to some extent. I don’t like the idea that making a racist remark means you are an evil racist and incapable of changing your views. But IMO, enough people feel this way that it may be difficult for this manuscript to get off the ground. And of course, some people don’t want to encounter racism at all in their reading material, which is their choice. I just happened to write something different.
Given that we don’t have a consensus about what constitutes acceptable speech in real life, to assume there’s one for all readers seems risky.
Sorry, I didn’t mean to make assumptions about what all readers found acceptable. I was trying to gauge how my approach to racism would be received, and given how controversial a subject this is, I felt there were different ways in which readers would react.
I completely agree. I didn’t mean to make it sound like I was shutting you down.
I’m more interested in what I see as a generational gap around language and how that translates to romance readers.
Dear heavens, yes, so very true, Dabney. Variety is the spice of life and is what makes us individual human beings and life worth living.
Here’s an example I talk to my kids about. Over 30 years ago when I was first trying to become a parent, gay rights were burgeoning in America. I have always been a huge supporter of queer rights and was one then. However I, like most people, thought that the best kind of parenting for children was two married heterosexual couples. And when I asked, I would say so.
Then I had my own children, got a little bit older, and met and read about gay parents. I realized I had been completely wrong about the need for healthy happy children to have two straight parents. Since then, I have been enthusiastic supporter of gay adoption rights and gay fertility rights.
I was wrong and I know that now and I have apologized to anyone that I might have inadvertently offended all those years ago. Could character be written with that storyline today? If it can’t, I find that worrisome.
I wonder if agents and editors would be concerned that a character who wasn’t completely supportive and inclusive at the start would not change later on. In other words, that the character would end up still holding a mindset we in 2021 would find problematic or even abhorrent, and that would turn readers off.
But… the author would write the change in a believable way and offer redemption. What then?
That’s assuming the author can and will write the change and offer redemption.
Maybe the agent/editor doesn’t know this from the sample pages. Maybe they read the sample pages where the character is in favor of gay rights but still thinks het couples make the best parents, and the agent/editor decides not to take a risk, when they could just as easily accept a manuscript where a character believes differently from the start?
Would they know it from the synopsis though? Harlequin and Carina Press, for example, require a spoiler-filled synopsis with every submission in order to anticipate implementation of key tropes, plotting, and character arcs. In this case, where the editor can see the development in full, I think there is still a fear of readers lacking enough patience to follow the character through an arc. Think about it. On Goodreads, Amazon, Twitter, and wherever else, there are people who say “DNF, read only 20% because main character was so racist!!!” I think that’s more what they’re afraid of than anything.
I’ll go out on a limb here and say that some characters should be allowed to hold nuanced, complex, controversial views throughout. While I don’t necessarily think that would be popular in a CR, I can definitely see such opinions being explored in a modern historical or HR. Heck, I know plenty of people today who hold similar views and wouldn’t mind seeing them cast as sympathetic rather than flat, villainous characters. After all, when did “tolerance” become such a dirty word? For myself, as long as nobody violates my life, liberty, or property, people can scorn me for my lifestyle choices all they want to.
As an addendum to that, naturally I would prefer that people treat each other with kindness, respect, and politeness as well as attacking ideas rather than the individual who holds them. (I know I have some work to do in this area at times…) But I think there’s room in the writing world for both politically correct, anachronistic HR lite and heavier, solidly researched HR that has its uncomfortable moments including “good” characters holding period appropriate beliefs that just don’t fly today.
Some agents don’t ask for a synopsis. I even knew an agent who didn’t read my entire query letter – she told me she read the first paragraph, thought it sounded interesting, went to the sample pages and only returned to the query after she was done with the sample pages, to see where the story was headed.
It’s possible, and there there are plenty of books I’ve DNFed.
However, if characters learn and grow beyond a rocky start, a review that only takes that start into consideration won’t accurately reflect the story. If I went by “what are the attitudes of the characters at the beginning of the story?” I would have missed out on a story like Pamela Morsi’s Simple Jess (which got a DIK review here) because at the start, the heroine has internalized her community’s belief that the developmentally delayed hero is like a child. But she learns and changes as a result, and I found that much more realistic and moving than if she was supportive all along.
Thanks for the clarification about agents. As a freelancer, my perspective and submission opportunities are largely different. Interesting stuff.
Agreed.
My perspective is that of a reader, not a writer. And as a reader, I hope for redemptive stories!
My perspective is that of a reader, not a writer. And as I reader, I hope for redemptive stories!
Elaine, I don’t think it’s you, it’s them. And by them, I mean the scaredy-cat traditional publishers who fold under the slightest criticism on Twitter and dump their controversial authors to fend for themselves. I’m firmly convinced it’s these annoying, whiny social media warriors who create nothing and destroy creators’ careers who are making today’s literary and media landscape suck so badly. All anyone has to do is yell “Racist!” or “Homophobic!” online, and a book can find itself cancelled along with the person who wrote it. This hostile atmosphere is scaring authors and publishing houses to produce content that is so innocuous to gatekeepers of far left-wing virtue that published work has become largely bland and insipid with painfully flat, obnoxious characters who are often anachronistically woke. And it’s a detriment to the higher virtues of good storytelling with well rounded characters who might- Heaven forbid- make their readers think.
Like you and a number of the commenters here, so much of publishing today fails to impress me. Two of my biggest issues in romance lately are poor editing and in-text disclaimers.
In regard to editing, some of the grammar mistakes I see on a regular basis are inexcusable. Granted, language evolves. But what does it say when traditional publishers with college-educated editors consistently don’t catch simple errors such as “try and” in the place of “try to,” or bungle “lay” and “lie?” This is part of a wider cultural problem. We’ve got a bunch of college grads who can yell “racist!” and “homophobe!” on the internet with wild abandon but can’t construct a coherent, grammatically correct sentence worth two cents.
As for the in-text disclaimers, I’m nearing the end of my patience with this damage control practice. When I read a pulpy, high octane romantic thriller where the hero and heroine are infiltrating the bratva, I don’t need a lecture in text how not all Russians are involved in organized crime. No kidding! You think your adult readers are too stupid to know that? And yes, this is an actual example from the Harlequin Intrigue title Undercover Connection. Or how about when a protagonist thinks an uncharitable thought- only to take it back within the same or next sentence? Heaven forbid a romance hero(ine) has a mean, petty, or controversial thought! I’m not even talking about them acting on it, just thinking it. Are authors, editors, and publishing houses worried readers will storm Twitter, angry that the protagonist engages in “wrongthink?” Even the great Beverly Jenkins recently fell into this trap in Wild Rain as in the following example:
Really? The hero isn’t allowed to be jealous for two sentences at least? I say, let him stew in it. He doesn’t have to tromp through a third of the book over something that amounts to a fleeting moment, but he should be allowed to feel a real human emotion for half of a paragraph. Or can readers today not handle complex characters who sometimes harbor negative thoughts and feelings?
Ugh, this is undoubtedly the bubble wrap and yellow tape generation of readers. I’m so tired of saying, “Woah, you could not write that book/make that movie today.” I say make them anyway, and let the perpetual complainers tantrum themselves blue!
You realize you can create a novel that causes a person to think – and even write a provocative romance with sexual tension and jealousy – without giving the world flatly-written caricatures, right? We don’t need to go back to the time of Cassie Edwards pidgin English speaking native characters or rapemance to get better-researched HR. I’ve seen plenty of books that include heroes and heroines who produce actual conflict in the modern era.
There are so many ways to write interesting plots, and so many interesting nontraditional heroines and heroes in the world
The poor editing is an entirely different subject, but there seems to be an epidemic of lazy editors in the mainstream press in general.
That’s exactly the argument I’m making. And I’m not defending “pidgin English native characters” or “rapemance” as somehow complex. But those portrayals are the other side of the coin of insufferable flat caricatures on the opposite side of the political spectrum. The Regency HR heroine who runs an orphanage, is secretly running around in gaming hells, shouts all over the place that she is only going to marry for love, and upholds every politically correct view of the 21st century all in the same story has become both a cliché and a flattened caricature that a number of HR readers- not just me- are finding annoying lately. It’s not that outliers didn’t exist, but even those on the fringe had to find ways to live within their time and place. That’s what makes historical fiction and HR interesting to a lot of readers, not 21st century time travelers putting on costumes.
Frankly, I think it’s a disservice to the genre when we totally blow past the challenges people faced on a daily basis. I’m not saying we have to dwell on dysentery and rotting teeth, but let’s not pretend the past was just this magic fantasy land filled with nothing but pretty dresses and fancy silverware either. If an author wants to go that route, fine. There’s a market for it, and writers should be able to do so. Likewise, readers who are interested should be able to enjoy it. Whatever. But those stories should probably be classified as “historical fantasy” or “HR lite” instead of “HR” or “historical fiction” to help readers find what they’re looking for instead of having to do so much digging.
Absolutely! You’ll find no argument from me about this. Unfortunately, these portrayals that could be fantastic are often bungled largely because writers are just plain scared to write anything even mildly out of line with current political thinking. Or they get avant-garde or chase trends instead of favoring solid historical research and complex characters who may hold some beliefs that wouldn’t fly in our era (thank goodness!).
Obviously, reading taste comes down to personal opinion. That’s why I always say, “The more books, the better! Read what you want and write what you want!” But cancel culture is a real threat to members of the artisan class (authors, filmmakers, etc.). A lot of writers can’t come forward about this for fear of losing their livelihoods, but I assure you, it is real. And it’s this real fear of having one’s career ruined from online pillorying that’s preventing diversity of thought and characters in stories while simultaneously bubble wrapping them in overly apologetic disclaimers.
Looks like I may have inspired a bit of reaction with my post but this Ask really was a good one. So, just a few comments back and excuse the length:
It’s not that outliers didn’t exist, but even those on the fringe had to find ways to live within their time and place. That’s what makes historical fiction and HR interesting to a lot of readers, not 21st century time travelers putting on costumes.
I agree with this POV and is something I have expressed so many times in the last 21 years here. However, I do agree, that some won’t like to read things that they find “hurtful”. OK, then don’t read it but don’t expect me to enjoy PC tinged HR so are we all agreed on that? I would not expect CR to have heroes who rape, pillage or keep the little woman in her box; nor would I like to see CR heroines who knit and have a baby every year. Modern times are just that – and things continue to evolve but the past is the past – it happened and we need to accept we can’t change it – we can strive to understand it and learn from it.
Absolutely! You’ll find no argument from me about this. Unfortunately, these portrayals that could be fantastic are often bungled largely because writers are just plain scared to write anything even mildly out of line with current political thinking.
Again, agreed in full. But let’s not think that all HR can be that way though, IMO, it certainly needs more of the non-traditional characters, wider geographic settings and usage of events often overlooked. I’d love to see HR set in, say, the Boxer Rebellion in China or the First Afghan War or maybe something incorporating the work of John Muir or Eleanor Roosevelt – lots of things to use out there. However, you can’t, for example, write about, say, the US Civil War without pointing out that there were both good and bad white folk and that there were more arguments being fought over than slavery. Or the Roman Empire – so much to exploit but there were folk like Nero and those who were settling the far-flung wider world and establishing an influence that lasts to today, tomorrow and far beyond. The old saying of you can’t make an omelette without breaking a few eggs is so true so, again, some will feel hurt, others outraged but honesty is the most important thing for me.
Obviously, reading taste comes down to personal opinion. That’s why I always say, “The more books, the better! Read what you want and write what you want!” But cancel culture is a real threat to members of the artisan class
Cancel culture worries me a lot. Freedom of speech, the ability to make up one’s own mind, the ability to travel where you want, when you want, have the friends you want, the access to books or media from everywhere is vital. I lived (on a work secondment) in a former Soviet bloc state that continues to suffer and endure many troubles so I have seen up close and personal what the loss of these freedoms means. I never carried a camera, made sure I was in the right setting when speaking my mind and kept my head down when out in public. You just never knew. One of my colleagues, a British man of Asian heritage was regularly stopped and searched and sometimes locked up by the police until he phoned us to get him released. We had close connections to the British Embassy, thankfully. I would not like to live like that forever. But it certainly was a 6 month eye-opener. And my female colleagues (non-British) used to ask me bring back M&B and other CR/HR for them when I was back in the UK for a home visit. These were unobtainable for them.
Grammar – &*+@~% !!!
I think shutting down voices is definitely something we should watch out for, but these days I see the cry against “cancel culture” being used to do the opposite. The accusation of cancel culture is being used to silence criticisms. I think once we start labeling something like this, the label itself becomes a weapon. It also means legitimate criticisms of misogyny, racism, homophobia,etc are lumped in and decried as political correctness, and summarily dismissed.
I still don’t know exactly where I fall in all this, but I’m trying to look at the instances I come across individually. If a reviewer(s) criticizes a work for racism etc., I’d rather look at the work and figure it out for myself than immediately assume they are right or wrong.
Reaction to their work has always been a threat to the artisan class. Not that long ago no one would review m/m romances for fear of backlash from readers. And getting anything published with lgbt or trans characters who were sympathetic was nigh on impossible. Cultural appropriation was rampant but having minority or immigrant MCs was a difficult sell. Publishing houses that are now wary of printing books with morally grey characters (such as Marian Perera described above) were once the gatekeepers of exactly the opposite–they kept forward thinking books from being published.
People groups that have been hurt in the past may be overreacting with criticism, but rebalancing the system may just take a while. Over-correction is always a possibility when righting past wrongs, but that shouldn’t mean we line up to fight the corrections. Perhaps we can be voices of reason instead of adding to the frenetic voices out there.
I agree, Carrie. I also hope that we keep talking about racism and its very real impact on the lives of those who face and have faced it. I worry that in all the hullabaloo about language, it’s easy to take sides and argue rather than get out and do the work that changes society.
I think one of the ways AAR handles these issues effectively is through their balanced reviews that are open to respectful comments and discussions. I know I learned a lot when we dissected the tribal tattoo in A Rogue of One’s Own by Evie Dunmore. But a certain other romance site was not willing to delve into the nuances, preferring instead to lambast it with a self-righteous rant plus an F, refusing to consider any positives in the story, and verbally shutting down anyone who disagreed, thereby creating an echo chamber rather than a chance to debate and learn.
I would argue that your willingness to entertain relevant discussions- when so few venues are anymore- is making a positive contribution to the literary world. Keep up the good work. :-)
And that’s what I want to do with my books – show people different sides of an issue and help change their minds.
I used to live in the Deep South. I know what it’s like to have a man smile at you and say he finds Asian girls hot, so I wanted to touch on fetishization in my story.
But I didn’t want my approach to be that no good person would ever come within ten miles of this and only villains do it. I think when people believe this, it’s easy for them to overlook any small instances of racism in their own mindsets, because racism becomes something only evil people practice.
I wanted the shock to the system that comes from a (relatively) nice person saying something we find problematic. And I wanted the heroine to do some serious self-examination on the matter of fetishization.
I don’t know if my approach will lead to a different set of problems later on down the line, and whether these problems are inevitable as the system rebalances itself, as Carrie mentioned. I don’t know whether this manuscript can ever be published. I just know I wrote it to be true to my experiences and myself.
I think these are all really, really important points in any discussion of “cancel culture”.
I agree with all this 100%. And, like you, I definitely want to see more time periods and locations explored in HR. Harlequin admits on their blog they can never get enough Regency England because it has a huge, voracious fan base that never gets tired of it. From a business perspective, that makes total sense. They won’t go broke offering a huge assortment of largely similar Duke-marries-the-serving-girl stories.
On the other hand, that’s hard for romance readers like me who love historical fiction with HEAs but aren’t fans of Regency England as a setting or titled characters. I realize that puts me in the minority- certainly from a statistical perspective- but we can’t be the only HR readers out there looking for less explored territory, of which there is a lot.
This is sort of off topic, but I think it would be super cool if Harlequin came out with a “Harlequin Retro” line to cover romances that take place between 1945 and ten or twenty years ago. They’re just now considering expanding HH into the 1950s, but that still leaves a humongous gap of potential stories. I realize they probably don’t want to offend customers (“You’re calling an era I lived in historical? How dare you!?”), but by not having a category for those in-between years, there are a ton of missed opportunities.
We need a new category – I reviewed a book set largely in the 1950s at the end of last year, and dubbed it a “modern historical”. The author Karen Grey (who is much beloved romance narrator Karen White) is writing rom coms set in the 80s and 90s and calling them “vintage historicals”. Yes, it’s odd for me to see those dubbed “vintage” – but then so, I suppose, am I… But either label works!
What makes “vintage” confusing to me is that it suggests that the book itself is from the 50s or 60s, like something you’d find in a “vintage store.” That’s why I used Modern Historical for our tag here. https://allaboutromance.com/review-tag/modern-historical/
As usual, Nan, you have nailed it. (And may I add, I feel comfortable agreeing with your posts only because I’m anonymous to all but the site admins.)
This explains why I have mostly given up on romance novels this past year. I seldom enjoy contemporary romances, but I’m also not interested in historical romances where the heroine is an SJW in some way, with remarkably 21st-century attitudes, and where the hero, of course, ends up championing the heroine’s cause, because he’s also becoming woke.
I prefer romances about flawed people–including people who are flawed (to me) because they are products of their times–who have an organic epiphany that allows them to become characters I can root for.
Hey, haven’t seen you here in a while, stl-reader. Good to see you! And thanks for the vote of confidence. While I can only speak for myself, I think my frustrations with the state of literature today are shared by many.
I’m not much of a CR reader either. Actually, contemporaries in general- literary or otherwise- generally don’t do much for me unless they have a unique angle or take place in an “exotic” locale (are we allowed to say that anymore?). Part of it has to do with the politics but also because a lot of modern-day life fails to interest me from a narrative standpoint. Sorry, but I’m not interested in reading about some plucky corporate worker bee in 2021 who accidentally sends her boss an inappropriate text. I want to read a romantic Western about an intrepid mail order bride who gets kidnapped by outlaws and finds herself falling for the undercover Texas ranger among them. Or something like that. And hopefully, like you said, sans intrusive 21st-century attitudes.
I love this and totally agree. One HR that really stood out to me for having characters be of their time and place was Olivia Waite’s The Care and Feeding of Waspish Widows. It is an FF romance with one heroine who is a widowed publisher with a radical teenage son, and one who is a beekeeper amicably married to a gay man to protect both of their true sexual orientations. Plus, the one heroine’s husband is a whaler. There’s no obnoxious “save the whales” rhetoric because this is circa 1820 when almost nobody would have thought badly of the profession. Nor does the author act like conservation is stupid. Waite firmly keeps her 21st century nose out of the narrative and just presents whaling as a feature of its time and place. I was floored and impressed to read that. And I loved how the whaler and his wife handle their mixed-orientation relationship in a believable, platonically loving, period appropriate fashion with neither one of them being vilified.
In short, there are excellent examples of HR that showcase the diversity many are seeking while still remaining true to the time period. But they are exceedingly difficult to find under piles of historical fantasy that really belongs in its own category.
Even if my English would be better I couldn’t have expressed my thoughts I so often have reading newly written books.
Thanks for the shoutout, Annelie. I appreciate that. :-)
I think it’ interesting that Jane Ann Krentz is the author people gave up on 20 years ago, but she’s still going strong.
I’ve read almost all the authors mentioned in this post except the one that got the “Best of” title, Adele Ashworth. I’ve never heard of her or Winter’s Tale.
I switched Jayne Ann Krentz from an author I buy to an author I read from the library or buy on discount many years ago. (Probably as long ago as thus survey or more). I know a lot of her newer books I end up reading just out of familiarity and because my hold comes through from the library.
Same here. She is reliable but fairly bland by now, for me, as far as her characters / love story is concerned, but her settings are mostly good. So, when I want a plain vanilla no upsets read, quick and well crafted, I pick up her latest, usually I am one or two books behind.
I like her historicals.
Of the favorite-titles list I have read only two! Welcome to Temptation – Jennifer Crusie is a favorite author, I’ve read all of hers multiple times – and The Viscount Who Loved Me. I’ve tried a couple other Julia Quinns but for whatever reason did not connect.
Will join in the Eve & Roarke love. I’ve been reading those ‘J.D. Robb’ books since day one.
Holy cow, I cannot believe it’s been 20 years for some of these. In my brain it’s been like 10 years. I guess I’m like those people they joke about who kept thinking the 90’s were like 10 years ago.
Dara Joy is a name you don’t hear of any more. Get Lucky by Brockmann was my all time favorite category romance. I’ll have to re-read it to see if it stands the test of time.
Mr. Perfect was a big hit that year but you don’t hear much talk about it anymore.
With technology and cultural norms changing so quickly, I think contemporary romances of 20-30 years ago don’t always age well. I loved Mr. Perfect, and over a few years I reread it several times. The last time was in 2012 and in my updated review I mentioned it was still good but felt “dated.” I read most of the Tall, Dark, and Dangerous series by Susan Brockman and enjoyed them. I stopped at the book before Get Lucky(don’t know why), but I see I actually bought that on audio,so maybe I’ll give it a go now.
I tried recently to read another Dara Joy book but,although I enjoyed several of hers years ago,I couldn’t make it past a few chapters this go-around. My tastes and expectations have changed. I did just pick up the boxed set of Susan Grant’s series that starts with Star King when Amazon ran it for free. I liked this series and hope they hold up.
I think when Contemporary romances are just slightly out of date they tend to jar more than when they really start to age. I know for me, at a certain point if I have enough distance that I can look back on them as almost “historical” even if it’s just the 1980’s or 1990’s now.
I re-read a Dara Joy a year or two ago just for kicks but it was one of her silly pseudo space ones not a regular plain old contemporary. You can’t take them seriously to begin with. I cannot imagine her contemporaries have held up at all.
I feel like Get Lucky will probably age well as Brockmann was always someone who was aware of consent and held pretty modern views but I guess I will find out soon enough. Hope you like it if you try it!
it’s great to see the love for by arrangement-it’s one of her best works and is a gorgeous piece of historical fiction, with a hero who’s actually morally grey instead of being the stereotypical “rake”
Her medievals are SO strong.
Winter Garden is one of my favorites. I can’t believe it’s 20 years old!!!
Madeline Hunter’s medieval series is classic too. Such an underappreciated collection.
I loved Madeline Hunter‘s medievals, and never got into her other books, though I still try every few years based on my old love for her.
Same! I tried one — it was The Romantic, from her “Seducers” series and it was good, lots of pining, but I wouldn’t say it was as “special” or unconventional as her medievals, if that makes any sense.