the ask@AAR: What are your hopes for romance in 2022?

Whoa–2021 is almost in the books. Thus, it’s times to think about what we hope for in romance next year.

Everyone’s likes and loves are personal and my list is just that. What’s on your list?

Less lecturing, more laughter. It’s been a rough couple of years. For me, romance continues to be a balm. After a stressful day, it’s a gift to be able to lose my worries in the pages of a love story. And yet, too often in the past year, the romance novels I picked up seem to be far more focused on reminding me the world is routinely terrible, that the patriarchy is bad, that intolerance is flat out wrong, and that history should be judged with a gimlet eye. Don’t get me wrong–I agree with all those concepts, but I don’t look to my love stories to sternly focus on that at the expense of joy. I’m looking for more Ten Things I Hate About You and less Isn’t It Romantic.

 

 

Happier families. I’ve relied so much on the love and support of my family in the past two years–I’m just currently not drawn to stories that paint families as cesspools. I want more relatives like Roy Kent and less like Logan Roy.

 

 

The return of the secondary lovestory. I have a serious jones for books with a strong secondary love story. Whether it’s April and Jack or Jess and Marie, a good extra romance that enhances the main couple is my jam. I’d like to see more of it.

 

 

Less violence. There has been a troubling trend in my reading to empower heroines by having them hit the hero. Hard pass. It’s never romantic for a hero to smack the heroine and it’s never romantic for the heroine to smack the hero. I’m also rooting for more romantic suspense that doesn’t build its suspense side with cases of violence against beautiful, young women, or really, women who exist only to be murdered, raped, or tortured. I strongly believe in the power of stories to show us the things in our world we must desperately change. That said, genre fiction overly relies on random violence against women and it’s just not working for me. I’m looking for more Rear Knives Out and fewer The Girl with the Dragon Tattoo.

 

 

Thoughts?

guest

37 Comments
newest
oldest most voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Elaine S
Elaine S
Guest
12/28/2021 10:53 am

For me 2021 was a pretty dry romance desert. I found little that really pushed my buttons and read more non-fiction than fiction. Like WendyF, I have been reading romance for a very long time, more than 50 years. I inherited my love for it from my mother who was amused rather than outraged when I pinched her Sergeanne Golon “Angelique” books from right under her nose. I am sure I was far too young and didn’t really understand much of it. So, here is what I would like to see:

Better standard of writing. NO preaching; by all means explore difficult issues or even “woke-ish” notions but, please, don’t cram it down my throat. As an adult I can form my own opinions. Dysfunctional characters and plots? That’s why I avoid “literary fiction” because it’s too, too depressing much of the time and I read romance to escape for a while into something comforting that should guarantee a HEA. Fewer grammatical mistakes, fewer Americanisms/Britishisms where relevant, fewer telling rather than showing stories because that is authorial laziness. Let’s have more accuracy (yes, not everyone craves it) in HR. But let’s refrain from dressing up historical stories with modern speech and language and, please, less overlaying HR with CR ethics and mores. Humour, yes, silliness, no; I really can’t contemplate reading stories where a NYC waitress gets involved with a “prince” from some made-up European dot on the map. Yuck to that. Better care in character development; it need not take 1,000 pages but well done it can take less than 100. Different settings, especially in HR. Right now the DH and I are watching Vienna Blood (S2) and though it’s basically a police procedural, it’s set in pre-WW1 Vienna and the landscapes, buildings, dress, etiquette, etc. are all very different from something set in dear old foggy London, etc. Why not more of this in HR? I’d love to see something set in ancient Rome or maybe Rome during the Borgias. Just a change from Europe or the USA, please. Tropes? I agree both with Dabney and WendyF. Yes to some new ones, please, but those I find as comforting as a hot cuppa on a cold afternoon – bring them on but, please, well crafted.

I am keen to see what 2022 brings. Not everyone will be satisfied and maybe those of us who are 50+ won’t find as much to please us as younger readers. That’s something I do wonder about: age of the reader as related to romantic fiction wants and desires. Discussion for another day perhaps.

Best wishes to Dabney, Caz, the review team and everyone who posts and lurks here for 2022. What would we do without AAR?

Lieselotte
Lieselotte
Guest
12/28/2021 10:42 am

2022 wishes:
I would like some good well grounded (contemporary ) straight up m/f romance..
I like m/m, and all the normal guys finding love.
That is what I would like to see in m/f too.

And I will go on reading m/m.
But m/f of a quality comparable to KJ Charles, Indra Vaughn, Lily Morton, A.J. Demas, Con Riley, Joanna Chambers & Sally Malcolm, Alexis Hall.
I would like that – I miss it.

For 2021, in m/f:
When I look back on my romance year:
I read a few auto buy authors in romance, Loretta Chase, Lucy Parker , Kelly Hunter, Dani Collins, Mary Balogh ( though she is slipping off my autobuy, I am put off by the mega families & updates in each book, especially since they add nothing to the plot), and for just quick diversions I read old series romance like Sophie Weston, Mary Burchell, Essie Summers, selected old JAKs series, I glommed Elsie Lee (then) contemporaries,

Which is very few contemporaries.

In between, I read a lot of fantasy with romance or without,, m/m, m/f, or not romance.

Elaine S
Elaine S
Guest
Reply to  Lieselotte
12/28/2021 1:12 pm

Dear, dear Elsie Lee! Long gone but not forgotten!!

PatW
PatW
Guest
Reply to  Elaine S
12/28/2021 3:02 pm

Still have some Elsie Lee on my keeper shelf – old, yellowed and falling apart but cherished nonetheless.

Elaine S
Elaine S
Guest
Reply to  PatW
12/29/2021 3:47 am

Barrow Sinister, anyone?!!

Lieselotte
Lieselotte
Guest
Reply to  Elaine S
12/29/2021 4:14 am

Diplomatic Lover – I love the heroine

Elaine S
Elaine S
Guest
Reply to  Lieselotte
12/29/2021 5:52 am

Although I read all of her out-put, it’s only EL’s Regencies that I still keep. To my mind The Nabob’s Widow was the best of the bunch. Have you read Paula Allardyce, Lieselotte? More writing at a similar time as EL; my favourite of hers was Octavia with the lovely French refugee/emigre hero.

Lieselotte
Lieselotte
Guest
Reply to  Elaine S
12/29/2021 10:54 am

I do not remember whether I read her way back when. But right now, no. I will check out if I can get a book of hers at a reasonable price to try.

I liked the Nabob’s Widow a lot, bought it based on a recommendation here and branched out. I was surprised how much I also enjoyed her (then) contemps :-)

Carrie G
Carrie G
Guest
Reply to  Lieselotte
12/28/2021 2:37 pm

I agree about wanting m/f books on the caliber of KJ Charles, et al. But for me there is another part. M/f has become more difficult for me because the gender stereotypes mess with the story, imo. When reading contemporary m/m, gender doesn’t come into it, so when one is rich and the other not, it isn’t about “the man is a billionaire and the woman is a dog-walker while trying to break into her chosen field” sort of thing. (The guy is ALWAYS the billionaire/CEO and the woman is…not.) I can read stories where one is rich the other is not, or one is well-educated and the other is more working class, or there is an age gap and not have the gender of any individual color how the story is written, or how it’s perceived by the reader. Could we have a book where the woman is the CEO and the guy works in a specialty shop down the street? Or the woman is older? (I’ve yet to read an age-gap romance where the woman is older.)

DiscoDollyDeb
DiscoDollyDeb
Guest
Reply to  Carrie G
12/28/2021 4:06 pm

Start with Anne Calhoun’s LIBERATING LACEY, the ne plus ultra of age-gap/older-heroine romances, imho. Not only is the heroine older than the hero, but she’s also wealthier. Turns all the tropes on their heads.

Carrie G
Carrie G
Guest
Reply to  DiscoDollyDeb
12/29/2021 12:30 pm

I went to goodreads and realized I have this on my TBR list from 9 years ago! (I took a 6 year hiatus from GR).Time to move this up on my list!

Lieselotte
Lieselotte
Guest
Reply to  Carrie G
12/29/2021 4:20 am

Yes, exactly!

I only noticed how many stereotypes m/f has to fight, bow to, circumvent,… when I started reading m/m. And how tired I am of that.

I have a tongue in cheek theory that -since it is mostly women writing m/m – this is actually a way of opening our eyes to how locked into the stereotypes we are, at least in romance (but probably it colors our lives, too).
Really subtle subversive feminism, those m/m books – ;-)

… plus all the good m/m authors do by showing how normal m/m is and how it was around all the time etc. and by making us happy with good romances.

Mark
Mark
Guest
Reply to  Carrie G
12/29/2021 12:18 pm

Addressing the power imbalance, the Bluewater Billionaires series from 4 authors in 2019 featured 4 billionaire heroines:
The Price of Scandal by Lucy Score
The Mogul and the Muscle by Claire Kingsley
Wild Open Hearts by Kathryn Nolan
Crazy for Loving You by Pippa Grant

Carrie G
Carrie G
Guest
Reply to  Mark
12/29/2021 12:31 pm

Thanks for the recs!

Becky
Becky
Guest
12/25/2021 3:31 pm

Good question! I wish for more well-written books showing the growth of true connection and intimacy, where well-developed characters talk about their emotions and their deepest hopes and fears. Good writing is extremely important to me. I see too many authors churning out books using a limited number of adjectives, verbs, and adverbs. Hot, sexy, and beautiful are nice descriptors, but don’t keep using them over and over again. “Fuck” has almost become a non-word in some authors’ hands, thrown into every other sentence. I do not mind the word specifically, just its overuse. And show me, don’t just tell me. If you tell me the character is intelligent, witty or charming, then show me through their actions and words that this is true. For example, I am listening to Alexis Hall’s Glitterland, and the contrast between the brilliant, well-educated Ash’s thoughts and dialogue vs. Darien’s working class Essex accent greatly enhances our understanding of these two characters and helps us appreciate the unlikeliness of their romance and the hurdles the will face. Romance has much to offer, and there are some high quality writers out there, but I would like to see more.

WandaSue
WandaSue
12/24/2021 11:11 pm

Less dukes
Oh please… less dukes.

SofhiaMarie
SofhiaMarie
Guest
Reply to  WandaSue
12/25/2021 3:50 pm

I wholeheartedly second that!

Susan/DC
Susan/DC
Guest
Reply to  WandaSue
12/28/2021 9:02 pm

I too want fewer dukes. I’ve actually bought some books just because they had a non-ducal hero (either a lesser aristocrat or even, heavens be praised, a commoner) and avoided some which seemed indistinguishable from the 137 other books with “duke” in the title published that year. It’s got to the point where Kelly Bowen’s “I’ve Got My Duke to Keep Me Warm” isn’t even about a duke; the hero is a duke’s brother.

Caz Owens
Caz Owens
Editor
Reply to  Susan/DC
12/29/2021 2:51 am

I know I edited/posted at least one review this year in which the hero was “duke adjacent” rather than an actual duke. This desperation to get the word into book titles is ridiculous.

I, too, would very much welcome fewer of them.

Lilly
Lilly
Guest
12/24/2021 4:56 pm

I wish there were more books with low sexual content … or the so-called “clean romance” that are not fluffy or small-town. Those plots are adorable but I wish I could read heavier and darker plots and at the same time that the story has a low level of sex there. I don’t think it contradicts itself.
I want more romantic heroes without much beard, faces with fine features, and slim or slim complexions. Big heroes too! Please, not so many square-faced muscular guys with bulging arms.
I want more contemporary Christian romance books with heroines in their 20s who are college girls just dedicated to studying: not caring for sick parents, working, or being single mothers. I want someone like me in those books young girls dedicated to getting a career, having friends and romance navigating the university environment while maintaining their beliefs and relating to friends who do not always agree with them.
Christian authors simply seem to jump from the youthful school stage to adulthood and not want to touch the university environment. I haven’t caught a Christian new adult genre yet. I want Christian romance writers to lose their fear of fantasy, parallel worlds, magic, powers, mermaids, werewolves … is fantasy and an alternate world! maybe in that alternate world there are different intelligent races besides human!

Last edited 2 years ago by Lilly
oceanjasper
oceanjasper
Guest
Reply to  Lilly
12/25/2021 2:59 am

Yes! I don’t like the term ‘clean romance’ because of its implications of moral judgement, but I do find a lot of sex in romance to be either redundant, a lazy author substitute for emotional connection or just written in a clinical and unromantic way. I would love to see more romances with less sex even though the storylines might be deep and angsty. I also want more heroes with less classical/cliched faces and bodies.

Lilly
Lilly
Guest
Reply to  oceanjasper
12/25/2021 3:29 am

I think the term “clean romance” is finally here to stay, a substitute has not been found for people to follow in Spanish they call it “white novel” or “white romance” as opposed to sadomasochism and romances with black or dark cover … it could be also because they are the opposite of “Dark romance” but I’m afraid that term is also complicated.
Some try “sweet romance” to counter “spicy romance” but then many say that a sweet book can have sex scenes as long as they are intensely emotional or subtle. And many of us who are looking for “clean romance” simply want without sex, even if they are subtle. I have seen in blogs that they do their own division, if hot romance is with a lot of sex then the opposite would be “cool romance”, and in reddit I have seen people who say things like … “recommend me a book with very dirty sex scenes” or “tell me the best dirty books you’ve ever read” or “books with a lot of dirty talk.” So it seems that some are taking the clean / dirty thing with humor. I wonder why we not only classify them as tv, G, PG to rank R. nobody is offended with that.

Last edited 2 years ago by Lilly
Mark
Mark
Guest
Reply to  Lilly
12/25/2021 12:58 pm

I think the TV & movie rating systems are based on level of violence and maybe use of offensive language as well as sexual content.
I described my label wishes years ago in http://www.ccrsdodona.org/markmuse/reading/genrelabels.html

Carrie G
Carrie G
Guest
12/24/2021 2:35 pm

I agree with all your points above,although I don’t mind an author taking on a social problem as long as it doesn’t turn into lecturing. Using it organically as part of the setting works for me. For example, I just listened to Madison Square Murders by C.S. Poe and the homophobia that pops up in the police force feels right for the story–present but not dwelt on.

I am really, really, really tired of family issues being the centerpiece of so many romances. My family has worked very hard with therapy and commitment to overcome a lot of issues. Manipulation, toxic and dysfunctional relationships, and judgmental parents are a reality, but I don’t want to read about it in every book. Without You by Marley Valentine is a good book, but the mom’s behavior in that was off the charts and never really addressed by the author.It brought my grade down a full letter.

Less violence, period, but especially against women. I know I’m missing some good books, but I’ve mostly stopped reading suspense novels,especially m/f.

I don’t love angst, but I do love emotional stories. I would love to read more books that pack an emotional punch without resorting to angst. I think KJ Charles’ Society of Gentleman series does that well. (As well as her Sins in the City series.)

This is personal,but I look forward to more books without children in them. It’s mainly because I find very few authors seem to write believable kids.

bethott90
bethott90
Guest
12/24/2021 2:11 pm

Luc/Oliver and Shane/Ilya in 2022. My wish list is complete.

Caz Owens
Caz Owens
Editor
Reply to  bethott90
12/24/2021 4:39 pm

YES! Very much this! :)

DiscoDollyDeb
DiscoDollyDeb
Guest
12/24/2021 10:05 am

I hope that in 2022 reading romance will continue to give me the joy, comfort, and refuge that it’s given me since I first picked up Anya Seton’s KATHERINE circa 1972. As in prior years, I anticipate being exposed to new authors and enjoying books from my established favorites: Rachel Reid, Kati Wilde, Serena Bell, Caitlin Crews, Jackie Ashenden, Maisey Yates, Kate Canterbary, and Karla Sorensen, among others, There are some tropes I like more than others, but I try to keep an open mind because I know from my reading experiences that a good writer can make any trope work. I don’t expect romance to right all wrongs, eliminate covid, or bring sanity back to the world (that’s a tall order for anyone or anything), but I like knowing that when things get too overwhelming I have a retreat and it’s as close as my kindle.

IASHM
IASHM
Guest
12/24/2021 8:03 am

I absolutely second the wish for more humourous romances and less awful families in them.
It would also be great with more heroes that aren’t playboys and who can never love (until they can) because of their parents’ unhappy marriage/awful father/awful mother/etc.
More regency era books à la Carla Kelly, more romances taking place in the 20th century (particularly 1930-1980), for Nicola Rendell and Cara McKenna to release new books…
I’d also like more books to be made available as paperbacks as well as e-books. It’s always a bummer when something is only released digitally.

DiscoDollyDeb
DiscoDollyDeb
Guest
Reply to  IASHM
12/24/2021 9:48 am

I believe Cara McKenna stopped writing and went into a completely different job field. I think I read that she said something along the lines of “writing wasn’t fun anymore” and moved away from it, alas! McKenna is right up there with Anne Calhoun on my “how I wish they were still writing” list.

IASHM
IASHM
Guest
Reply to  DiscoDollyDeb
12/24/2021 1:57 pm

That’s too bad about McKenna & Calhoun. But here’s hoping that they might change their minds and decide to pick up the pen/open the laptop again.

Mark
Mark
Guest
Reply to  IASHM
12/24/2021 11:57 am

Having humor has been one of my main reasons for selecting romances since I started to read in the genre in the 1990s. I record humor scores (on a scale with a maximum of 5 stars) for romances I read. Since tastes in humor are extremely individualistic, it is best to compare recommendation lists to see if they overlap with yours. My complete list of books read with humor scores high enough to recommend is at http://www.ccrsdodona.org/markmuse/reading/romwhumorlist.html.
Below are a few authors with releases next year who have existing books with enough humor for me to usually auto-buy their new releases:
bailey, tessa
fenske, tawna
grant, pippa
krentz, jayne ann
langlais, eve
nicholas, erin
quick, amanda
reid, penny
sands, lynsay
shalvis, jill

IASHM
IASHM
Guest
Reply to  Mark
12/24/2021 1:53 pm

Thanks! :) I’m familiar with several of them already, but I’ll take a look at the writings of the new-to-me authors on the list.

oceanjasper
oceanjasper
Guest
12/24/2021 5:45 am

I haven’t found enough time to read romance this year, what with the world being run by morons and lurching from one disaster to the next, etc. What I’m always looking for is originality (or at least scenarios that haven’t been done to death) and unusual pairings and characters who learn to appreciate each other’s qualities and convince me that they’re really falling in love (as opposed to the author just telling me they are). I hope I find some romance audiobooks with smart writing that can be savoured when read aloud, because I can’t skim the boring bits and the extraneous sex scenes. A historical intriguing enough to tempt me back to a subgenre I’ve practically abandoned would be nice. Actually, I just want to find romances compelling enough to tear me away from the news.

WendyF
WendyF
Guest
Reply to  oceanjasper
12/24/2021 7:25 am

I’m with you on “scenarios that haven’t been done to death”. After reading romance and romance-adjacent books for over 50 years, my tolerance of some tropes is pretty low! I’m sure this is a major reason why I’ve shifted to reading mainly m/m books. Also, there are some stunningly good authors in its top league.

Lieselotte
Lieselotte
Guest
Reply to  Dabney Grinnan
12/29/2021 4:13 am

I love the forced proximity / “necessary” marriage / fated mates, in any version. And I have my (small but constant) Harlequin Presents addiction, cannot go more tropey…
So some tropes I just adore no matter how contrived – but only well done, of course.

That said, I could not have a steady diet of tropes, so I really need both..