TEST
The Wedding Wager has a bright sense of humor and a decent sense of character building. But its plotting is nonsensical, its research lacking, and the fact that it’s wallpapery and a little too modern in its thinking make it a low priority. It doesn’t have the spark to reach a DIK-level read, and unless you’re desperate for something to read, isn’t worth picking up on impulse either. It’s one real positive is a decent relationship between the hero and heroine.
Lady Victoria Kirby is a sour budding archeologist with absolutely no social grace at all. She has struggled her way through a season and plans not to be married at all, intending to remain a spinster so she can pursue her studies and continue cataloging her father’s artifacts. But then her father, the Marques of Halford, decides to wager her hand on a card game, which he promptly loses.
Rake-only-on-paper Derek Marcus Andrew Kent, the Duke of Chase, stepped into the game when he noticed what Victoria’s father was doing and that a letch was about to win her hand. He’s not one to sit idly by while a woman is abused – especially not after what happened in his own family. So he involves himself in the card game and wins instead. This solves Derek’s own problem – he’d needed to attain a wife with no strings attached, emotional or otherwise, to satisfy the requirements of his title. He has no plans to have an heir and no plans to fall in love and has taken a vow of celibacy in light of his own parent’s failed marriage. Victoria just wants to be left alone in the dirt with a brush and a pik. It’s a match made in heaven, right?
All Derek wants is a wife in name only. All Victoria wants is to excavate an ancient Viking burial mound on her family’s property. They are not the same, but they are both on course for a head-on collision with love. Now if they can only work out their complicated feelings about their families and one another…
The Wedding Wager has a decent sense of humor, which permeates the whole book with a sense of lightheartedness. That helps to make anachronistic observations about the imperialism of the British Empire as spoken by white Brits go down easier.
The romance is very low-conflict, but I admit I enjoyed it because Victoria and Derek are two nice people who want to do anything but fall in love with one another. I did groan at Derek’s insistence upon calling Victoria “Victory,” though. They become friends quickly, and he becomes protective of her vulnerable sister.
But their motivations are poorly explained. Derek’s reason for celibacy feels weakly reasoned, and Victoria’s father decides to wager her for reasons that are never explained (he’s portrayed as a loving parent otherwise). Things happen because the plot requires tension, not because it organically needs to happen to advance the story.
And the writing gets in the story’s way. Devon also desperately needs to dial back her tendency to show instead of tell what’s happening to her protagonists and her reliance on repetition. How many times does Victoria tell herself – and Derek tell the audience – that she is plain, so plain, this is why he chose to marry her and will never boink her, because of her plainness? Enough!
Readers will also likely have enough of The Wedding Wager before it wraps up. Eva Devon is a veteran of over forty historical romances, but based on this, I’m not likely to be picking up any of the others.
Buy it at Amazon
Visit our Amazon Storefront
Grade: D+
Book Type: Historical Romance
Sensuality: Warm
Review Date: 15/11/21
Publication Date: 10/2021
Recent Comments …
Yep
This sounds delightful! I’m grabbing it, thanks
excellent book: interesting, funny dialogs, deep understanding of each character, interesting secondary characters, and also sexy.
I don’t think anyone expects you to post UK prices – it’s just a shame that such a great sale…
I’m sorry about that. We don’t have any way to post British prices as an American based site.
I have several of her books on my TBR and after reading this am moving them up the pile.
I’d like to see heroes influenced by their parents’ problems in other ways. “My father once ate a shrimp cocktail that disagreed with him. I will therefore avoid all seafood.” At least that would be a bit more original.
Hah. True. I know tropes are tropes for a reason, but the old “my father was X so I must Y” chestnut is so overdone in historicals especially, and it’s become such a well-worn plot point that writers are not even bothering to attempt to find a logical reason for the behaviour. It’s downright lazy.
HAH! God, that’d be fun.