
TEST
The Broken Girls by Simone St. James:
A Roundtable Discussion
Simone St. James is well-loved by the staff here at AAR, so we have been eagerly anticipating her new book. The Broken Girls is a dual-timeline story centered around a boarding school for the teenaged girls society has turned its back on, and the mysteries that surround those who live there. The story hops back and forth between the 1950s and present day Vermont, so fans of historical fiction definitely have something to look forward to.
In the 1950s, a group of four young women are struggling to survive life at the bleak Idlewild hall. Each longs for love and understanding, but no one has the time or the inclination to grant them that, and so these four lost, troubled souls have banded together in hopes of creating something resembling a family unit. Unfortunately, forces both earthly and supernatural threaten their very existence.
In 2014, journalist Fiona Sheridan is still struggling to come to terms with the murder of her older sister. For the past twenty years, she has tried to content herself with the fact that the responsible party is behind bars, but something has niggled at her, making it all but impossible for her to move on. When she learns that Idlewild Hall, where her sister’s body was found, is being restored by a very wealthy, anonymous benefactor, she decides to write a story about the school, and maybe lay some of her personal demons to rest along the way. But as Fiona begins to look into the history of the school, long-buried secrets are unearthed, secrets with the power to endanger Fiona and those she loves.
AAR reviewers Shannon, Maggie, Kristen, and Lynn got together to share their thoughts and feelings about this complex novel that blends historical fiction with supernatural intrigue.
SD: I’m a huge fan of books set around boarding schools, especially schools for troubled teenaged girls. So, when I first read the synopsis for The Broken Girls, I knew I had to read it. What originally drew your attention to this novel?
MB: What drew me to the book was the author. I’ve read all of Ms. St. James’ novels and have enjoyed every last one.
KD: I’m fascinated by the ways that society has shoved ‘troublesome’ girls into locked away spaces, but I’m also trying to expand my reading, and books with flashbacks are not usually ones I pick up, so wanted to stretch myself.
LS: I’m a big fan of the author, and I’ve enjoyed all of her books so far. For that reason, I’d already planned to give this one a whirl. However, it had so many elements (creepy and possibly haunted old property, boarding school, dual timeline) that are just like catnip for me.
SD: I haven’t read many of Ms. St. James’ previous novels, so I’m definitely no expert, but The Broken Girls had a very different feel from the few I have read. The most notable difference for me was the lack of a romance. We do see Fiona struggling with the relationship she’s in, but that relationship wasn’t the novel’s primary focus. Personally, I missed the romance angle here. What about you? Did you find this novel different from others you’ve read by this author, and if so, did those differences work for you?
MB: I found the section regarding the girls at the school contained the eloquent, chillingly atmospheric, thrillingly spooky writing I expect in one of this author’s works. Those sections went straight from the page to my imagination, creating a motion picture with rich characterizations, eerie, hair raising moments of genuine fear and completely drew me in. Fiona’s story was of no interest to me and I wasn’t really interested in her romance, which in the end proved to be more an alliance than a relationship.
KD: This is the first by this author for me, so can’t speak to changes from her other works. However, I agree with Maggie that the ‘past’ stuff was completely compelling and the present less so.
LS: I also felt that the portions of the book set in the past were by far the strongest. The 1950s plotline was a little different in tone, but did still have something of the gothic mood found in St. James’ earlier books. The modern plotline, though, read a lot more like a straight-up thriller. Well written, but I had a hard time making myself care about Fiona’s relationship. I think this is largely because as a reader, I never felt like I got a real sense of her boyfriend as a person. I did miss the romance in this book, but I loved the mystery. On the 1950s side, I felt like the author did a good job of showing how trapped the girls at the school were, and even though there wasn’t a central romance, I got sucked into the mystery and the dynamic between the friends.
SD: Let’s talk a bit about the character of Mary Hand. I’m not a big fan of ghosts, so Mary was problematic for me and I didn’t feel she added much to the overall story. Sure, the idea of the school being haunted made it kind of spooky, but I would have been just as happy if Ms. St. James had just focused on the mysteries without adding in the supernatural element. How do all of you feel about Mary?
MB: Here again I had a disconnect between the historical portions and those taking place in modern times. In the historical portions, Mary very much lent ambience to the overall aura of the school, a home for girls discarded by their families through no fault of their own. Mary in many ways reflected that herself, lending to the idea that the location itself was somehow cursed. Two of the scenes which I remember most clearly are where Mary tries to harm CeeCee, and the portion in special detention. Those segments were written with such emotion and clarity that they sent chills down my spine. On the other hand, I found it ridiculous to have Fiona scared of a ghost in modern day America. We have plenty of real monsters here and a ghost would be far from the scariest of them.
KD: Right, so I wasn’t here for Mary at all. Maggie, I see your point that she added to the atmosphere, but she took me out of the story more often than not. I would have been more compelled, I think, by a monster who was alive and directly affecting the girls than a ghost. And in the modern day? Nope. Another reason why I couldn’t really be doing with Fiona and it felt like the book was trying to do too many things.
LS: I agree with Maggie that Mary Hand absolutely fit into the 1950s plotline. Her presence helped underscore what was happening in that school. I thought she was overemphasized in the modern-day plotline, although I don’t agree that it would be ridiculous for Fiona to be scared of her. GIven Fiona’s history with that school, I can see where she would be in an emotional position to be susceptible to believe in Mary Hand. I did like how Fiona was able to bring closure to the Mary Hand story, but in the modern-day plot, a little bit of Mary went a long way.
SD: Speaking about the characters, I sometimes found Fiona difficult to deal with. I could sympathize with her need to uncover the truth about her sister’s death, but I didn’t always agree with the ways she chose to investigate. In some ways, her single-mindedness was admirable, but I also found it frustrating. I wanted her to acknowledge the good things in her own life instead of constantly living in the past. How did Fiona’s character work for you?
MB: Fiona didn’t work for me. She wasn’t looking for closure to her sister’s death; the trial should have provided that. She was looking for details and that felt petty to me. I think I would have felt differently if she had come back to town after having carved out a real life for herself but that’s not what happened. It’s like she froze in place even after they received justice and I found that very frustrating.
KD: Ladies, we are in agreement. Every time we were in present day, I found myself fighting the temptation to skim. I never understood Fiona’s deal and never found a reason to root for her. I wanted her to find the truth of the girls’ lives, but all of the other stuff that came with Fiona was a waste of time.
LS: Fiona didn’t really work for me. I don’t necessarily agree that the trial would have provided the closure she needed; I’ve practiced law long enough to know that that just doesn’t always happen. Trials very often answer the question of “who” but don’t always get to the “why” or the “how” of what happened. And sometimes a person needs those answers to make sense of things. Even so, Fiona’s justification for many of her actions just didn’t ring true and didn’t seem very focused. I did, however, get caught up in her investigation of what happened to the girls at the school.
SD: I love historical novels, and I found the parts of the book set in the 1950’s to be far more compelling than the parts set in the present. Did one timeline work better for you than the other, or did you find yourself equally invested in both?
MB: I felt that in the historical timeline the author did a much better job of creating compelling characters, a scary setting, and a riveting plot line so it was by far my favorite. The contemporary portion felt like just another ho-hum small town police procedural. I would have loved it if that had been cut in half and we would have been given more of what happened to the girls as they grew up, rather than getting that in synopsis form.
KD: YES. I believe the book would have been stronger if had been structured differently. Instead of all the alternating bits, introduce us to Fiona – eliminate half of her drama, but use her as the vehicle to the story – and then spend most of our time with the girls and really let us settle in. Then, wrap up with Fiona – because I did enjoy knowing about the final outcome, but I didn’t need to spend so much time in the present as Fiona built her case.
LS: I’ve said it earlier, but yes, the 1950s plot worked a lot better for me. I enjoyed this book quite a bit and the 1950s plotline just haunted me. However, I do think a structure similar to what Lauren Willig used in the Pink Carnation series would have worked much better. In those books, the reader would often see the modern characters at the beginning and end of the book and check in with them a few times throughout the story. However, the historical plotline took up a lot more of the action. In dual timeline books, there doesn’t have to be a 50-50 split between the two time periods.
SD: So how would you grade the book? Since it didn’t work for me nearly as well as I hoped it would, I’d have to give it a C+. There were things I liked, but the story left me feeling disappointed. What about the rest of you?
MB: My overall grade for the story is a B. I loved the concept, thoroughly enjoyed the 1950s portion of the tale and loved the characters I met in that part of the story. I think if the book had been written solely in that time period it would be an A but the contemporary portions pull it down to a B.Â
KD: I’m going with a C+, because I was so ugh over the contemporary bits that I would have completely skimmed them if not for this review. The 1950s parts were very good, but oooooooofta with the contemporary stuff.
LS: My reasoning is very similar to Maggie’s but I did dither over my grade a bit. I think I’ll give it a B+ because the 1950s parts of the book did haunt me so.
Buy it at: Amazon/Barnes & Noble/iBooks/Kobo
Grade: B-
Book Type: Historical Mystery
Sensuality: Subtle
Review Date: 18/03/18
Publication Date: 03/2018
Recent Comments …
Yep
This sounds delightful! I’m grabbing it, thanks
excellent book: interesting, funny dialogs, deep understanding of each character, interesting secondary characters, and also sexy.
I don’t think anyone expects you to post UK prices – it’s just a shame that such a great sale…
I’m sorry about that. We don’t have any way to post British prices as an American based site.
I have several of her books on my TBR and after reading this am moving them up the pile.
I’m in agreement with both Blackjack and Chrisreader on this one. It was a solid B for me. I listened to the audiobook, which is narrated by Rebecca Lowman. I quite like her as a narrator.
I finally received my hold from the local library and was able to read this book. I thoroughly enjoyed it. While I agree that it does depart in some ways from her previous works in that there was a less “traditional” romance in it I felt it was very much in Ms. St. James’ style. The haunted school reminded me a lot of the asylum in Silence For The Dead, with the supernatural element amplifying the emotions and experiences of the residents. The people were literally haunted by the ghosts they brought with them as much as by Mary Hand.
I was very surprised that none of the reviewers felt much connection or sympathy for Fiona. I truly felt for her and her family and the way her sister’s murder just ripped a hole in their lives. I don’t blame her at all for wanting to know the hows and whys of her death. Perhaps it’s because I have a sister the exact amount older than me than hers was and knowing how much she influenced me and how real Fiona’s feelings felt to me that I sympathize more. I just cannot agree with the idea she should have just gotten over it because someone went to jail for the crime.
I enjoyed the part with the 1950’s schoolgirls very much but it was IMHO the much more dramatic and less realistic part of the story. It reminded me of the old potboiler “Lace” where the schoolgirls all band together to help each other and keep their secrets and friendship throughout their lives. I also thought the idea of the ghost was timeless. Maybe it’s the years of reading Barbara Michaels books but I don’t see ghosts and modern novels as incompatible.
The one area that did ring untrue to me was the motivation of the villain. I could easily believe he was under the sway of the rich influential family, particularly if it had been mentioned they had been paying him off or had evidence to hold over him. The idea he was doing it mostly because they were good for the town etc, seemed a bit hard to swallow. He covered up two murders (or certainly tried) for no more gain than just keeping the job he already had? That seemed a bit far fetched to me.
I think overall it was a well written and entertaining book with a strong emphasis on women gaining power over their lives and I would rate it higher than its grade here. Not an A but probably a solid B+. I can’t think of another current author who writes this well in this current genre.
Her books are just all so consistently good and elegantly written. For a favorite though it might be The Other Side of Midnight, though I also loved An Inquiry into Love and Death too. Now, unfortunately, we have to settle in and wait probably a long time for a new one.
Glad the book is working for other readers. I did think it was a good read but not her best. I’m not sure which I would rate as a favorite among the others since each of them have haunted me so. The Other Side of Midnight has my favorite romance but the others are all excellent as well.
Had to finish this in one sitting because it was so good, actually my favorite so far by the author. Excellent story. And scary too!
I was surprised to find that I loved the contemporary part as much as the historical, and I actually did really like the romance in the contemporary section too. I loved the older woman/younger man aspect of it and the subtle ways in which Jaime cares for Fiona, who is very often rather tough and aloof with him. The romance in Lost Among the Living is still my favorite, but I liked this one too. And I was surprised that as much as I love St. James’s 1920s settings, her shift to contemporary and to the 1950s worked for me as well. The flashbacks to the 1950s is quite strong and the book has important messages to make about not just the devaluation of young girls but the devaluation of elderly women too. Women have such a short window of time in their lives to be socially valued and that’s really due to their objectification as sexual beings.