Based Upon the Romance Novel By…
A week or two ago, while flipping channels, I delightedly discovered that I got the Lifetime Movie Network. I don’t usually watch Lifetime movies, but the particular film playing caught my attention: Nora Roberts’ Blue Smoke.
I’ve heard of the Nora Roberts Lifetime movies, but never had the opportunity to watch them. As my roommate and I — and her confused but game boyfriend — watched the movie, I got really into it. It wasn’t any cinematic masterpiece, but it was decently composed, the male lead was cute, and there were enough fires and explosions to keep us all — roommate’s boyfriend included — interested. (We’ll disregard the ill-advised shirtless carpentry on Bo’s part.)
The next day, I bought the 2009 set of Nora Roberts movies on iTunes for the low price of $9.99, which just about equaled what I had left from Christmas iTunes gift cards. Since then, I’ve watched three of the four movies: Midnight Bayou, High Noon and Tribute. (I’ve yet to watch Northern Lights.) High Noon was okay, but the woman who played Phoebe was too soft, had awkward timing with line delivery, and there was something vaguely flirty yet shy about how she spoke, neither of which fit Phoebe’s character. Duncan was quite something, though– cute, charming, and sexy. Tribute was similarly okay but not spectacular, with really bad low-budget dream sequences. Midnight Bayou was the best of the three, and the flashbacks, while occasionally cheesy, were generally well done.
I can’t help but wonder, though, if maybe Midnight Bayou and Blue Smoke’s appeal was partly because I had forgotten much of what happens in those books. There were fewer mental comparisons and more simple enjoyment or the romance and the suspense.
Tribute couldn’t escape the shadow of real life, regardless of the quality of the film. The climax of the story, which involves Cilla getting drugged, was just sad. Cilla was played by the late Brittany Murphy, who died in 2009 of a combination of things, including multiple drug intoxication. While I haven’t watched Northern Lights, there’s a story attached to that one, too: Leanne Rimes and Eddie Cibrian, the stars, left their spouses after meeting on set and having an affair.
Nora Roberts remains one of the few romance authors who have had their work adapted to film. Sure, there are romantic movies that started as novels, but they’re usually the depressing sort without happy endings– “literary” fiction, not “genre” (and thus, supposedly, “superior”). You’d think with the proliferation of bad romantic comedies out there, they could pick up a few interesting, compelling romance novels to make into movies, rather than recycle the same ideas and situations and characters. I know romance novels in general get the same criticism as rom-coms, but I think we’ll all agree that while there are some formulaic books out there, there are way more funny and unique ones with complex characters.
We all love to “cast” actors and actresses into the characters of our favorite books. If a beloved book is chosen for adaptation, we await with breathless anticipation. And, inevitably, we complain that the movie wasn’t right, didn’t get it, ruined the book. Maybe this is why producers would rather hire a second-rate screenplay writer to construct a cheesy romantic comedy (or drama, or suspense, or whatever) than get film rights for a good novel — because films simply can’t fit in an hour and a half what writers spread over 350 pages. Whatever the book, the plot and character development will be watered down to fit the film’s time frame (which is roughly equivalent to the capacity of the human bladder after eating a large popcorn and large soda).
That was certainly the case with the Nora Roberts movies I’ve seen so far: scenes cut, characters simplified, the romance rushed. In the end, though, I’m not upset, and the producers didn’t “ruin” anything. As movies, they’re not exactly brilliant, but they still carry the essence of why we love romance novels: the relationship, the growth of love, and the Happily Ever After.
– Jane Granville
I agree, Claire. Viewers want Sookie-Bill-Eric. BTW, I am seriously hoping the next season will be book 4. Book 4 is my favorite.
Sandy, I agree with everything you said in your post. I can’t understand it either.
I just saw yesterday that True Blood has gained viewers every season and imho a lot of it has to do with the Bill-Sookie-Eric plot.
I find it incredibly mysterious still that Hollywood churns out lame rom com after lame rom com when there is a treasure trove of romance novels to choose from. I seriously don’t get it — and never will.
Nora Roberts, a huge, bestselling author, has to settle for Lifetime movies? John Grisham gets mainstream movies with mega movie stars and she gets LeAnn Rimes?
I find it especially satisfying that Charlaine Harris did better. True, she’s not traditional romance but we’ve claimed her (and she comes to romance conferences) and she got Alan Ball and HBO. For once, a rom writer got what she earned in Hollywood. The fact that True Blood has been so successful will (I hope) bode well for other romance authors.
Haven’t figured out how to edit. . . .but to add to my post.
Reading allows me to visualize the heroine and hero in a certain way, and usually what I have envisioned doesn’t match the movie.
I am probably in the minority, but I don’t watch Lifetime. . .and while I like romantic comedy movies, I not tempted by romance movies. . .
I too enjoyed Blue Smoke as a movie, as well as loving it as a book. I felt the other three failed as movies (for me). It’s really too bad because, with the exception of Northern Lights (a book I didn’t like), the films chosen were good reads, especially High Noon. The acting, along with the story narrations, were awkwardly done in the three.
Two movies that come to mind adapted from romance books and were well done were The Outsider by Penelope Williamson and A Season for Miracles by Marilyn Pappano. I have caught them on TV at various times and still enjoy them. Other than those two, no other films pop out at me adapted from romance books that were done well enough to remember.