| |

A Guest Post by Debbie Baldwin: The Fairytale Conundrum

Happy Holidays, AAR readers! My name is Debbie Baldwin, and I am the author of the Bishop Security romantic suspense series. The first novel, False Front, is currently available in print and e-book at all major online booksellers. Book Two, Illicit Intent, will hit the virtual shelves in December. Let me start off with a sincere and heartfelt thank you. Without passionate readers like you supporting independent authors, I wouldn’t have a job, and countless wonderful books would go undiscovered.

I set out to write a novel with a clutch-your-Kindle, heart-bursting love story combined with a smart, relevant thriller. My struggle when I first began, and as I continue, is how to take that alpha-male/damsel-in-distress paradigm and make it modern. I don’t mean something so simple as having a female protagonist with a powerful or dangerous career, but rather, giving the man and woman equal emotional power while still allowing for the sizzling dynamic that fuels a passionate romance.

Romance novels used to be called “Bodice Rippers,” and there’s a reason for that. No matter how enlightened we become as a society, the idea of a dominant, experienced partner paired with a complimentary counterpart, sparks a fire in fantasy. I’m an Ivy League-educated professional with a law degree, but I’d be lying if I said I didn’t love a good, steamy rescue fantasy. The absolutely essential requirement is consent. As long as both characters are fulfilling their romantic vision, let the buttons fly!

The key to a twenty-first-century fairytale, for me, lies in the couple dynamic. I have found one character can assert his or her capabilities all they want, but if their partner doesn’t acknowledge that ability, the pairing is somehow off. In False Front, Nathan Bishop is a corporate executive and former Naval Intelligence officer who hides his secret warrior behind the facade of a rich playboy. (He is inspired by the iconic title character in Baroness Orczy’s classic novel, The Scarlet Pimpernel.) Nathan’s love interest, Emily Webster, is a highly-skilled, capable woman. Yet, when a madman wants to abduct her, it requires both Nathan and Emily working together to save her. More importantly, it absolutely requires Nathan to respect and rely on Emily’s abilities and think of her as an asset, not a victim.

The second installment in the series, Illicit Intent, features Nathan’s best friend Miller “Tox” Buchanan and the free-spirited reporter, Calliope Garland. This novel’s romance explores the true meaning of “opposites attract.” Tox is rigid, orderly, and contained. Calliope gets lost chasing butterflies on her morning run. The key, again, is respect and admiration for the antithetical qualities of the other person, a romantic middle ground where both Calliope’s and Tox’s attributes fit together to make them stronger as a couple—and they will need both of their skill sets to track down missing billions stolen from a hedge fund, solve the mystery of some infamous stolen art, and save Calliope from an unknown threat.

So bring on the fairytale. The Yin and Yang symbols are curved for a reason; the dynamic between romantic partners is not a flat line. There is give and take, dominance and submission, weakness and strength on both sides. The passion of this connection ignites when each character acknowledges and respects the attributes of their partner, and when they realize those qualities are not only valuable but actually enhance their own. When the whole is greater than the sum of its parts, romance soars.

guest

22 Comments
newest
oldest most voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Chrisreader
Chrisreader
Guest
11/28/2020 3:32 pm

I think one of the problems of Romantic Suspense (which I’ve always enjoyed) is that (as in real life) it’s usually a woman or child in danger. A great book however, can have the person be in danger without being weak or stupid. I love the idea of the hero and heroine complimenting each other and using their skills. And I agree the woman doesn’t have to be the “muscle” to be strong and capable.

I’m looking forward to checking out your books. Thanks for the post.

nblibgirl
nblibgirl
Guest
Reply to  Chrisreader
11/28/2020 4:43 pm

Totally agree. I can only add: Sam Starrett and Alyssa Locke.

Chrisreader
Chrisreader
Guest
Reply to  nblibgirl
11/28/2020 11:26 pm

Remember how exciting that was waiting to see how their romance would play out?

debbie baldwin
debbie baldwin
Guest
Reply to  Chrisreader
12/12/2020 6:33 pm

Thank you, Chris! I think you’ll be pleasantly surprised by the female MC in False Front. She’s always thinking!

nblibgirl
nblibgirl
Guest
11/28/2020 3:29 pm

Thank you for a provocative post Debbie! I think we net out in the same place: an interesting journey with characters, who in the end, acknowledge that they are happier and better together than apart. But, unless your definition of “fairy tale” = HEA/HFN, I think the genre has moved way beyond them.

I’ve been married a long time, and I totally appreciate the fact that on occasion IRL I can abdicate my responsibilities in all manner of situations to my partner. He can take over and deal with whatever issue is at hand. What a relief that is!

But if I’ve enjoyed fairy tales and “bodice rippers” in the past, it is because I wanted to feel desire – not domination. I don’t care for power imbalances IRL and I don’t find them interesting in my reading, either (unless the underdog finds a way to win, of course).

Most genre fiction IMO provides one type of hormone rush or another: westerns and thrillers provide an adrenaline rush. Even the more intellectual puzzle-solving in mysteries can generate adrenaline. Romances also deliver an hormonal rush. It is as simple as that, IMO.

Fortunately, we’ve moved on in the genre from only one type of character being desirable and for only one reason: (beautiful, young, innocent, white, heterosexual, helpless = fairy tales) to beautiful, et. al. PLUS capable of sexual satisfaction = bodice rippers; to fully developed, multi-dimensional, diverse characters who respond to each other with respect and admiration for whatever talents or strengths those partners bring to each other’s lives.

debbie baldwin
debbie baldwin
Guest
Reply to  nblibgirl
12/12/2020 6:25 pm

Yes, I agree! It’s really cool to see the genre evolve.

Nan De Plume
Nan De Plume
Guest
11/28/2020 2:32 pm

Thanks, Debbie, for the lovely, thoughtful post. I love hearing fellow authors’ behind the scenes stories and thought processes.

As for rescue stories, my big pet peeve is when the heroine just stands there like an idiot when the hero and the bad guy have their big showdown. Sure, if she’s tied up, injured, or otherwise incapacitated, that’s different. But I grit my teeth whenever I see an old movie where the heroine just stands there. I always feel like shouting, “Lady, what if your guy loses the fight? Either get out of there or help your man!” I mean, at the very least, she could take off her shoe and bop the bad guy over the head rather than standing like a statue. Yeesh… Even worse is when this thankfully diminishing cliché is combined with a heroine who’s just there for the hero to rescue. No character or anything, just someone to throw over the back of the horse and ride into the sunset with as the credits roll.

I am happy to say that the kind of “sexy lamp” heroines I’m describing are largely a thing of the past. I totally agree with you that there needs to be mutual respect and chemistry between the leads. Like you said, they don’t need to be tough-as-nails trained spies/mercenaries/whatever, but their skill sets need to complement one another.

Finally, I love your reference to yin yang. I also wanted to add the importance of those two dots- the yang within yin, and the yin within yang- in the Taijitu (yin-yang symbol). Nothing balanced can be entirely yang or yin. Each has an element of the other. As such, a good alpha hero should have a drop of softness/vulnerability just as a good damsel-in-distress should have a drop of aggression. Just my philosophical thought of the day…

Chrisreader
Chrisreader
Guest
Reply to  Nan De Plume
11/28/2020 3:27 pm

I am the same Nan! One of my favorite movies is the Michael Mann directed “Last Of The Mohicans” but it drives me how crazy how passive Alice is when Uncas is fighting for their lives. I know she’s depressed and worn down but their lives are on the line and it’s the man you love! Poke somebody! Push them off a cliff! Step on some toes!

Nan De Plume
Nan De Plume
Guest
Reply to  Chrisreader
11/28/2020 6:42 pm

Haven’t seen Last of the Mohicans but I can easily imagine the passivity you described. I mean, sure, I understand a woman can’t reasonably be expected to take down a gargantuan thug all by herself, but she might be able to do something. I had an ugh moment like that when I watched The Princess Bride for the first time the other day (delightful film, have no idea why I didn’t watch it years ago). The hero is being mauled by a giant rodent, and the heroine just stands there like a dummy. I was practically screaming at the TV, “Come on, Buttercup! Your man is being eaten alive by a giant rat. Do something! His sword is right next to your feet. Grab it, stupid!” She gives the rodent one half-hearted bonk with a stick, but that’s it. With a “true love” like Buttercup, who needs enemies?

One movie that surprised me a lot was the climax of the 1927 silent film Uncle Tom’s Cabin. Simon Legree has two of the heroines backed into a corner in the attic (I think one of the women is Eliza), and the ladies throw vases, chairs, and whatever else they can find at him. Now that is what you are supposed to do when the bad guy is coming for you. I’m just amazed such a violent, high octane ending existed in the silent era. Phew! And frankly, I’m surprised the actors didn’t get hurt during filming. (Although I wouldn’t be surprised if they were. Safety standards for actors weren’t really a thing yet.)

nblibgirl
nblibgirl
Guest
Reply to  Chrisreader
11/28/2020 11:22 pm

Like you, Chrisreader, I’ve always loved that movie; and I’ve often thought Mann overdid the effort to make Madeline Stowe’s character Cora look strong and capable next to her completely passive sister, Alice. Haven’t read the book to know how close to the source material Mann was working. But Stowe and Daniel Day-Lewis were absolutely breathtaking in their scenes. Passivity by comparison not required AT ALL.

Chrisreader
Chrisreader
Guest
Reply to  nblibgirl
11/29/2020 11:40 am

So much was changed from the book (which has its own issues) that Mann admits he based it on the 1930’s film more than the book. He changed characters names (Natty Bumppo became “Nathanial Poe) and instead of Chingachgook being like his brother and Uncas more his nephew the ages were played around with to make Uncas his peer.

It’s Cora Uncas loves and Alice Major Hayward falls in love with (and is engaged to by the end of the novel). Magua also wants Cora who is Alice’s half sister and mixed-race (her father married her mother in the West Indies and Cora’s mother was descended from slaves). She doesn’t kill herself but is killed in a fight.

In the book Cora is the emotionally strong one and Alice is more delicate but nobody is hopping off of cliffs.

I love the movie and get that the idea is that Cora is the older, more protective sister but I wish they hadn’t made Jodhi May such a wet blanket. She’s a great actress and could have handled more acting and I would have enjoyed the romance between her and Uncas fleshed out.

I agree the romance between Madeline Stowe (an underrated actress IMHO) and Daniel Day Lewis is breathtaking. I think Michael Mann put everything into their pairing.

Last edited 3 years ago by chrisreader
Nan De Plume
Nan De Plume
Guest
Reply to  Chrisreader
11/29/2020 12:05 pm

Speaking of Last of the Mohicans, have you ever read Mark Twain’s article lambasting what a terribly written book he thought it was? It is entitled “Fenimore Cooper’s Further Literary Offenses,” which can be read here: twain-coopers-prose-style.pdf (strangebeautiful.com).

Some of my favorite lines are the following: “Cooper’s style is always grand and stately and noble. Style may be likened to an army, the author to its general, the book to the campaign. Some authors proportion an attacking force to the strength or weakness, the importance or unimportance, of the object to be attacked; but Cooper doesn’t. It doesn’t make any difference to Cooper whether the object of attack is a hundred thousand men or a cow; he hurls his entire force against it.” LOL!

This article is the sequel to an easier-to-find article analyzing Cooper’s The Deerslayer. It is entitled “Fenimore Cooper’s Literary Offenses.”

Chrisreader
Chrisreader
Guest
Reply to  Nan De Plume
11/29/2020 2:14 pm

Yeah, I think the ideas and characters of Cooper are better than the execution. Last Of The Mohicans is largely considered unreadable now and a lot of it is considered stereotypes. I think he was important in shaping American literature for his time but to be honest I prefer interpretations of his work better than his actual work.

I think what makes Twain, Dickens, Austen and the other great writers so great is how readable they still are today. They are truly enjoyable and immersive. You care so much about the characters.

Twain is right (he often was) that Cooper is caught up in “style” while Twain and others expressed genuine feelings.

Nan De Plume
Nan De Plume
Guest
Reply to  Chrisreader
11/30/2020 5:38 pm

I think he was important in shaping American literature for his time but to be honest I prefer interpretations of his work better than his actual work.”

I think this is true of a lot of early/classic writers. You take Ben Hur, for instance. The 1959 Charlton Heston movie is far superior to the meandering text by General Lew Wallace. Honestly, the book was a DNF for me because the prose reminded me of that famous Bulwer Lytton competition entry, “On the second day the camel died…” Expand that into a book, and you have Ben Hur.

Also books like Robinson Crusoe. I’m sure they were groundbreaking for their time, but they just go on and on.

Lil
Lil
Guest
Reply to  Nan De Plume
11/28/2020 5:10 pm

I have been furious with passive heroines waiting to be rescued ever since I was 12 years old reading Ivanhoe, which I loved, BUT there was Rowena sitting in a burning castle waiting for someone to save her. I could never understand why he didn’t pick Rebecca.

Chrisreader
Chrisreader
Guest
Reply to  Lil
11/28/2020 6:41 pm

Oh Rebecca! I couldn’t understand either. But I guess it was a comment on not being able to cross religious barriers.

In the 80’s TV movie Rowena was just a passive, ornamental figure. In the 90’s remake they tried to give her that that Spice Girls “girl power” so she was a little more interesting and worthy.

Nan De Plume
Nan De Plume
Guest
Reply to  Lil
11/28/2020 6:46 pm

Sitting in a burning castle? Really? Ugh… I give credit to the 1938 version of The Adventures of Robin Hood. Maid Marian is smart, proactive, and does everything but lead the charge to rescue Robin. She pretty much plans his entire rescue after the archery debacle (dumb move on Robin’s part) while his merry men bumble around a tavern. Seriously, Marian’s a keeper. If Robin left everything up to Friar Tuck and Will Scarlet, he probably wouldn’t have escaped the gallows. And when the time comes, he rescues her right back. Now those two are a team. :)

Chrisreader
Chrisreader
Guest
Reply to  Nan De Plume
11/28/2020 11:25 pm

Marian is the best! I love Olivia deHavilland- her scene at the window in the lame gown with Errol Flynn is so charming.

In the Robin Of Sherwood series from the 80’s Marian gets a bow, learns how to shoot and becomes one of Robin’s team- making guerrilla style raids on the rich and fighting for justice.

debbie baldwin
debbie baldwin
Guest
Reply to  Lil
12/12/2020 6:23 pm

I agree! The female MC in False Front actually rescues herself at one point. I’ve had readers remark how much they loved that.

debbie baldwin
debbie baldwin
Guest
Reply to  Nan De Plume
12/12/2020 6:21 pm

Thank you for your thoughtful insights, Nan!

Carrie G
Carrie G
Guest
11/28/2020 8:31 am

I love RS and will happily add False Front to my TBR list. I like rescue fantasies, as well, and I like that you’re trying to balance the power dynamic. You phrased it as “equal emotional power” and that’s an important distinction. I don’t mind one character having the obvious advantage of skill and experience, but really dislike the truly helpless victim. Even if the victim is helpless to save themselves, strength of character and a brain that works makes for a more interesting story. It’s more rare, but I enjoy when the trope is turned on it’s head and the rescuer is the woman with the skills and smarts, and the victim is a man who may have no experience with military, law enforcement, or such, and relies on the skills of the woman for rescue.

debbie baldwin
debbie baldwin
Guest
Reply to  Carrie G
12/12/2020 6:20 pm

I’m with you, Carrie! I think you’ll enjoy False Front. The female MCis no shrinking violet!