The Wayback on Wednesday: A Winning Review Parody

Reviews Parody Contest 1999 (from December, 1999)

Merry Christmas, everyone, and a joyous holiday season to all! Today we announce the winner in our first ever Reviews Parody Contest! First we’d like to thank all those brave and talented readers who participated in the contest. Every entry was incredibly creative and laugh-out-loudable!


Proud Pillars Thrusting

It is rare to read a first effort of the magnitude of Proud Pillars Thrusting. I am, frankly, pleasantly surprised to discover this book in hardcover. The publishers have evidently realized the value of the perfection of prose and characterization. The dust jacket is of a Renaissance painting, one that depicts the richness of Venice and hints at the tale inside the covers.

Where do I begin?

The author has taken the unusual and innovative tack of having no underlying plot. But that doesn’t detract from the characters’ interaction. On the contrary, the avoidance of sub-plot and ancillary characters cleans the canvas of this remarkable work of art, leaving us to feel as the characters feel, experience the depth of their emotion as they learn about themselves and each other.

“John, oh, John!” she screamed, arching her hips.“Marsha, oh, Marsha!” he grunted, thrusting deeply into her.

Such is the clarity and the verisimilitude of this author’s prose. I found myself more than once wondering how a woman, clearly so young from her author photo, was able to tap into the emotions of people twice her age. But that was only one clue to her literary brilliance.

Her ability to communicate the anguish and the tragedy of syphilis had me weeping in compassion more than once. If I had had gonads, they would have swollen in sympathy.

The poetic purity of the author’s writing shines through each and every page. Especially in the final scene, where the hero lovingly and tenderly uses the heroine’s navel as a repository for his seed because she is too sore to take him once again. How much more uplifting and cerebral can writing be?

I simply cannot say enough about this book. It is, plainly put, a sweeping panorama of passion. One scene after another of turgid flesh and engorged nipples and fluids of all description had me turning page after page. I was captivated by the heroine’s tears, ached in compassion for her obvious (dare I say it?) saddle sores. But the last scene, where they fall asleep entwined in each other’s arms in the middle of the wet spot has me wiping yet another tear from my eye.

— Anne E. Mouse
Anne E. Mouse is the pseudonym of a reader who would like to remain anonymous.
 

guest

6 Comments
newest
oldest most voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Lynda X
Lynda X
Guest
03/04/2020 5:50 pm

I used to adore these contests. I remember one year’s winner (which was probably at least 20 years ago) which was a job application for a Regency heroine. Let’s have more reprinting of the winners. Even better: let’s have these contests again!

I know. I know. Too much work for the valiant volunteers who contribute the reviews, etc. of this site. Reality always intrudes into wishes.

KesterGayle
KesterGayle
Guest
Reply to  Lynda X
03/04/2020 9:54 pm

Well, maybe an Ask column could just allow us to post review parodies for fun, that way the editors here don’t have to spend time voting on them and such. Lots of us seem to have talent with words, it could be fun.

Nan De Plume
Nan De Plume
Guest
03/04/2020 3:39 pm

Fun read! Just FYI, I found there is indeed a 1991 book described as “cheesy” which actually bears the title “Proud Pillars Rising.” It’s a Western by Ana Leigh, in case you’re looking for some “saddle sores.” Never read it, but I wouldn’t be surprised if Anne E. Mouse used it for inspiration in the parody article.

Speaking of well written vs badly written sex scenes, I ran across this NSFW article that AAR readers might find interesting. I think it’s just as applicable to romance writing as it is to erotica. You know, since we’ve been talking a lot about the subject on the most recent the ASK@ AAR: https://pasiphile.tumblr.com/post/80091364553/sex-writing-101.

nblibgirl
nblibgirl
Guest
03/04/2020 2:25 pm

Nice!

And reminds me of a novel originally published for kids (although it really should have been marketed to romance readers) called Weird Stuff, by Richard Tulloch https://amzn.to/32NtzLk
It’s the story of a young man (maybe 10?) who borrows a romance writer’s purple pen to complete an assignment at school . . . and mayhem ensues. The story is cute and had me laughing out loud.

stl reader
stl reader
Guest
03/04/2020 11:33 am

“The author has taken the unusual and innovative tack of having no underlying plot.”

Okay, now that I’ve stopped laughing at this brilliant start to the reviewer’s analysis, I just want to say that PPT is a clear example of that romance sub-genre known as PWP or “Porn without Plot”.

In my search for the perfect Spike/Buffy fan fiction back in the day, I came across a lot of this. (Though to be fair, a lot of good Spuffy fanfic was also written, IMHO.)

Elaine s
Elaine s
Guest
03/04/2020 1:19 am

Fab!! Revival time?? And I always loved the cover contests, especially for worst offerings. Maybe a discussion of “The Worst Ever Romace Ever Written”. We’ve all had a few F- experiences :-(