The Best of 2019–Dabney’s List
Like many an AAR reader, I was a child repeatedly decried as “lost in a book.” I am a swift reader and, while growing up, read a book every two days. In 2019, I read 87 books (for the first time) and reread countless others. And, fortuitously, I lost myself in many.
The most fun I had reading last year, I owe to Holly Black whose The Folk of Air trilogy I devoured as though it were the Kindle equivalent of Fosters’ Key Lime Pie (my favorite dessert EVER.) All three books are DIKs–my review of the first two, The Cruel Prince and The Wicked King is here, my review of the final book, The Queen of Nothing, is here–and, taken as a whole, they are fabulous.
The series is exquisite enchantment–gorgeous, absorbing, lavish with magic, love, and conflict. The books build on one another beautifully, each deepening the complex narrative and illuminating the dispositions and motivations of the characters. The principals here, varied and satisfyingly authentic, are among the believable I’ve encountered in fantasy. Black mixes the contemporary and the mythic in ways that surprise and the the romance between Jude and Cardan is flawless and one I’ll savor in the years to come.
Buy it at Amazon
I confess I had a hard time settling into The Art of Theft. The overarching plotlines of this series are complicated and, when I began reading this fourth novel in the series, I couldn’t recall who had done what to whom and why. However, after a month of picking up and putting down my iPad, I finally connected to the narrative and suddenly found I could do nothing but read. As usual, Thomas’ writing, plot, insights, and character are phenomenal. And, in a time where art is judged through the lens of our (and there’s the rub, isn’t it?) moral compasses, those who wish to inculcate their stories with progressive values should use this book as their textbook–this is a story whose feminism, support for queer love stories, etc… is woven brilliantly into the novel. (You can read Caz’s DIK review of the novel here.)
I could have used more Charlotte and Ash but who couldn’t?
Buy it at Amazon
After reading The Art of Theft I longed for more Sherry Thomas. Given that Mulan is one of my favorite animated films and The Magnolia Sword: A Ballad of Mulan received rapturous praise from AAR’s Alex and Caroline (you can read their DIK review here), the book seemed like a smart choice. I listened to it–which I highly recommend, Emily Woo Zeller is superb–and loved it. Rich with historical detail, humor, and intrigue, this fabulously feminist #ownvoices telling of Mulan (Did you know that the Disney movie is based on a folksong from China set during the Northern Dynasties?) is ethical and engaging. #winwin
Buy it at Amazon
I love books where I immerse myself in the unknown, in characters and worlds wildly unlike my own. But there is a peculiar joy in reading a book that feels as if it was written for me, about my world. Such a book is Jennifer Weiner’s masterly novel, Mrs. Everything, which follows two white sisters over the course of their lives, beginning in 1950. Though I wasn’t born until 1961, the scope of this novel is the story of being a woman in the United States as I experienced it, decade after decade. (You can read our DIK review here.) Weiner is interested in change, both personal and societal; if you’re convinced we’ve not made any progress in the past 70 years, well, I’d say you’re wrong and this expansive, generous novel shows why.
Buy it at Amazon
I like Laura Lippman’s standalone stories–What the Dead Know is smashing– and so when Shannon gave a DIK to Lady in the Lake (you can read her review here), I read it. It’s not a perfect book but, months after reading it, I still think about it. As Shannon wrote, “Not only does this novel deliver a fascinating mystery, but it also explores the darkest parts of the human heart and mind as it unearths dangerous secrets.” Lippman’s sense of place–Baltimore in the 60s– is on fire here and her insights about both the civil rights movement and the women’s movement are thoughtfully devastating. It’s a book made for satisfying book club discussions.
Buy it at Amazon
Have you read Denise Mina? I have and, though I’ve enjoyed her earlier works, they’re often… grim. Conviction, her 2019 bestseller, is not. It’s a wild rumpus of a read; funny, astute, and so smartly plotted I found myself thinking oh no she didn’t in the best way possible. At the novel begins, Anna McLean, an upper middle class Glasgow housewife is bored with her comfortable life, and spends her mornings drinking coffee and listening to true-crime podcasts–the latest about a family murdered on an exploding yacht (the Dana). By the end of the second chapter, her life has blown up spectacularly, she’s on the run with the least likely of sidekicks, trying to solve what really happened on the Dana, and is finally coming to terms with her past. I tore through this book, then went back and read it, slower, appreciating the prose and plot, a second time. Both times, it was a gas.
Buy it at Amazon
I, like several other AAR readers, adored Dukes Are Forever (you can read our DIK review here) and Lady Derring Takes A Lover (you can read our DIK review here.) The former finished out Bec McMaster’s fabulous London Steampunk series perfectly–I wouldn’t change a thing–and Long’s return to historical romance was a gift. They were the best straightforward romances I read this year.
Buy them at Amazon
One wouldn’t think it a romance, however, Circe by Madeline Miller is not only a love story (of sorts), it is the most extraordinary book I read last year. I listened to this book and, when its last words were uttered, I found myself sobbing. It was such a glorious beautiful thing. I felt as though I had been given some extraordinary gift, that the experience of listening to this book was a rare joy. I regret I’ll never again be able to hear it again for the first time.
We live in a time of great rage. Many believe the worst of us will prevail and that the horrors of the world outweigh its wonders. I have never held that belief tightly to my heart or to my mind. Life is a gift and there is so much to cherish. Even mourning, in its own way, is a blessing.
This book is a celebration of humanity, of womanhood and, yes, even manhood, with all of our flaws and glories. I hope you all will read it.
I’ve switched so completely from printed books to ebooks that JAK/AQ hardbacks are the only books I still get in printed form. Since I refuse to pay $10 or more for any ebook, I often don’t read books from price-fixing publishers in the year they are released. There are several 2019 titles from this and the earlier lists that are still tbb for me because of the prices.
Mark- I borrow a lot of digital titles from the library and now some publishers have made it that they limit how many new releases a library can buy right away. Where the big libraries around me in major cities could buy 30 or even 90 copies of a hit new release (Like they did with George R.R. Martin type authors) now they are only allowed to buy one copy.
Romance books are frequently the most requested books apart from new political books and huge bestsellers so the waitlist is ridiculous. On the first day the book is put up online to reserve there can be a six month waitlist for that one book.
A lot of publishers are really awful. It’s like they are deliberately trying to keep books out of the hands of people with mobility issues, people with lower incomes. disabilities etc. It really makes me angry,
This is the notice my library has put up on its website. I posted it to my Facebook account when it first came out.
ATTENTION EBOOK READERS: Starting November 1, Macmillan publishing will only allow libraries to purchase *one* eBook copy of its new releases. We expect this to cause significant delays for patrons. This makes us mad, too. Visit our FAQ to learn more. #ebooksforall.
Yeah, I’m annoyed about this too. Thank goodness most romance books I’ve read digitally come from HarperCollins. But as far as I know, all the Big 5 publishers have punishing restrictions on e-book sales to libraries. Based on internet and in-person conversations I’ve had with librarians, each fiction e-book costs a library system about $30+, and some are on metered licenses instead of one time purchases. This is because publishers assume an e-book (which can’t be lost, stolen, or damaged) can circulate forever and therefore never gain another sale on that title. That, of course, is absurd. Many patrons try before they buy. But they operate on the belief that all patrons are like me, the kind who never buy books. Of course, if it’s not available in the library, I just say, “Forget it.” So they’re not getting a sale out of me either way except peripherally if the library buys a copy of something I request.
As for Macmillan, I don’t think they understand library patrons’ reading habits. I am a huge library user, and if a library doesn’t have a book I want or can’t get it through interlibrary loan, I don’t read it. Period. So if Macmillan thinks severely restricting e-book access to libraries is going to magically increase their tanking sales, they are sadly mistaken.
On a final depressing note, I remember reading a comment posted somewhere ages ago from someone who used to work for a Big 5 publisher. She said something to the effect of, “You don’t know how hostile the Big 5 publishing culture is to readers. They would outlaw libraries if they could get away with it.”
I’m very excited to check these books out! I always feel quite confident that I will enjoy books you recommend. Looking over your list and all the ones previously posted has made me realize how shockingly out of the loop I am when it comes to romances published in 2019. I think, like many others, I read a lot of other genres mixed in and I always seem to be reading books or series from a year (or several years) behind. And romances I did read from 2019 didn’t all seem to wow me or a lot of others. (Penny Reid who usually tops these lists come to mind). Looking forward to branching out a bit more, One cannot live on Bec McMaster alone….
Holly Black has helped with my Bec McMaster cravings.
Speaking of Bec McMaster, I just received her newsletter and this was in it. I hope it works out.
“It’s official! London Steampunk TV rights have been sold to a producer. While this doesn’t mean there’s going to be a TV show anytime soon—the producer has to write the screenplay and then sell the series to a station—it’s definitely a huge step forward, so fingers crossed for London Steampunk fans.”
Oh, I wanted to add that Circe has been on my radar for a while. Ever since I became obsessed with the incredible graphic romance serial Lore Olympus, I’ve been drawn to Greek mythology. A real life friend who is not a romance reader recommended this book for me and so I’m happy to see it listed here on a romance site.
That’s one of the many things I love about AAR. They list historical fiction, mythology, women’s fiction, etc. in addition to their mainstay romance. I certainly wouldn’t complain if AAR kept romance the exclusive focus of the blog, but I appreciate how they incorporate crossover appeal with recommendations outside of or overlapping with the genre.
I think the variety of books listed here as well as on other AAR posts also helps dispel the stereotype that romance readers only like one type of genre. So many of us read so broadly!
Naturally there’s nothing wrong with just liking romance, if that’s someone’s exclusive genre. But to me, books are like cuisines. Who says you can only like one type of cuisine? Likewise, who says you only like one type of book?
So thanks Blackjack and Ms. Grinnan for bringing up Circe. I too am happy to see a book outside of romance posted on a romance website.
I was flabbergasted to, as I listened to the last words of Circe to realize it functions as a romance. And its ending is as happy an resolution as any lit fic I’ve read in ages.
Interesting. Once in a while, you find that rare literary novel that has a HEA. And it’s a wonderful treat! The only one I can think of offhand like that is the novel version of “P.S. Your Cat is Dead” by James Kirkwood. Granted, it’s a comedy from the get-go but the resolution- as improbable as it is- still managed to make me smile. Of course, how much realism can you expect when the premise is a wannabe actor and novelist catches a burglar (who burgled him three times, no less!) and ties him to the kitchen table- only for things to get philosophical?
Sorry for the tangent. But when you mentioned happy endings in literary fiction, that was the only example of something I read within the past few months that sprang to mind.
“….the stereotype that romance readers only like one type of genre.”
*facepalm*
I wonder if this applies to readers of other genres too. Does anyone think that people who enjoy horror never read anything other than horror?
I feel this way about music as well. I listen to EVERYTHING so when I read about “rap” fans or “country music” fans as though they are a monolith, I’m always ticked.
I listen across music genres too. Your comment about “country music” fans reminds me of that scene in the “Blues Brothers” where the owner of the bar who books their band says with pride, “We have both kinds of music here- country *and* Western.” (As though those are the only two real kinds of music in existence.)
As for my taste in entertainment, I am oddly both eclectic and picky. By this I mean, I don’t generally care what genre a book, movie, or song is in. I either like something or I don’t, usually without a sound reason why. To decide whether to read or watch something, I have to look at the premise of the particular story. It’s not usually a case of “Oh, this takes place in Ancient Egypt so I’m sure I’ll love it!” (Although Ancient Egypt would certainly get my attention to read the product description.)
And yes, I’m one of those annoying people who finds it easier to explain what genres/tropes I *don’t* like rather than what I *do* like. I.e. There are certain genres, like horror, that I am simply NOT going to read because I don’t like being scared. As for things I like, I determine that on a case by case basis rather than by its genre or tropes.
I agree 100%. My music library on my phone/iPad would be considered eclectic at best, I think it’s why I often enjoy soundtrack albums as they can feature great and diverse music and I always seem to pick up a new favorite artist there.
I am very suspicious of people who say they hate an entire genre. Really? There isn’t one country/rap/rock/pop/r&b ( or fill in the blank) song you like? Even if you don’t love everything in that genre.
I have a prejudice that people who only read, listen to, watch one thing etc. are going to be boring.
I am seriously down on that as well!
I too think Sherry Thomas incorporates progressive views on LGBTQ identities as well as feminism into this fourth book in her Lady Sherlock series. The book has received some negative pushback from readers who felt uneasy with the abundance of diversity in the story, and there are some interesting reviews on GRs to this effect. I think it’s telling that when choosing to portray queer romance, Thomas chose two women, especially given the popularity of M/M romance today and the near invisibility of lesbian love in mainstream romance. And the women are considerably older than the average age of romantic and sexual couples. I love too Charlotte’s collaborative approach to crime-solving. The detective genre historically consists of the lone male detective who stands head and shoulder above mere mortals, preferring to work in isolation and needing no one until he’s ready to reveal the plot – Sherlock Holmes included. Readers know Charlotte is just as brilliant as the conventional male detective but she understands that women are emotionally intelligent and succeed in collaborative work. The group in this fourth Lady Sherlock book is getting quite large, but it’s exciting to see everyone’s skills put to the test as Charlotte encourages them. There’s a lot going on in these books and I just adore the entire series.
Thank you for a wonderful list, Dabney! I’m adding a few titles to my ever-growing wishlist.