|

The 2019 RITA® Award winners!

Romance Writers of America (RWA), the trade association for published and aspiring romance fiction authors, announced the winners of the 2019 RITA® Awards on Friday, July 26, at a black-tie awards ceremony at its 39th Annual Conference in New York New York. The evening was hosted by Sarah MacLean and was notable for its celebration of diversity within the genre. The entire ceremony can be seen here. RWA has also compiled a stellar list of Trailblazing romances that may be seen here.

The RITA® Award is the highest award of distinction in romance fiction and recognizes outstanding published romance novels and novellas.

Up to 2,000 romance novels and novellas from 13 different categories are judged each year in the RITA® competition. After the first round of judging by fellow published romance authors, the competition narrows to approximately 100 finalists. Then, final round judges, also published romance authors, select one winner in each category from among the finalists.

The 2019 RITA® Award winners are:

Romance Novella: Bad Blood by M. Malone

Contemporary Romance Long: Long Shot by Kennedy Ryan (our DIK review is here)

Young Adult Romance: My So-Called Bollywood Life by Nisha Sharma

Historical Romance Long: A Wicked Kind of Husband by Mia Vincy (our DIK review is here)

Romantic Suspense: Fearless by Elizabeth Dyer

 

Paranormal Romance: Dearest Ivie by J. R. Ward

Erotic Romance: Three-Way Split by Elia Winters

 

Historical Romance Short: A Duke in the Night by Kelly Bowen (0ur DIK review is here)

Romance with Religious or Spiritual Elements: The Saturday Night Supper Club by Carla Laureano

 

Contemporary Romance Short: The Bachelor’s Baby Surprise by Teri Wilson

Contemporary Romance Mid-length: Advanced Physical Chemistry by Susannah Nix (our review is here)

Mainstream Fiction with a Central Romance: How to Keep a Secret  by Sarah Morgan (our review is here)

Best First Book: Lady in Waiting by Marie Tremayne

guest

31 Comments
newest
oldest most voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Caroline
Caroline
Guest
08/01/2019 12:04 pm

I believe the novella that won a RITA a few years ago with an Asian-American heroine was HIS ROAD HOME by Anna Richland. The hero was, IIRC, Latino, and an amputee. It was a FABULOUS novella.

mel burn
mel burn
Guest
07/31/2019 7:28 pm

Great thread, very informative. I don’t really care about the RITA awards, in fact I can only get passionate for AAR’s 100 or the long lamented DABWAHAs which was SO MUCH FUN! And I rarely read reviews and then only after finishing a book or a review of a book I would never read.
The thing is: blogs like AAR, SBTB and DA are what gets the word out about what’s what in Romancelania. I’d be a dumb bunny without these resources.
And for what it’s worth….I’m stunned Bowen won. She has written some very good historicals, but ADitN was not one of them, frankly I could barely finish it without tossing it at a wall. Still, I’m glad she won, she is one of the few new authors with a fresh take on HR.
Thanks again for the great discussion!

Wendy
Wendy
Guest
07/30/2019 5:19 pm

Aren’t Iris and August in Long Shot (Kennedy Ryan) of mixed racial ancestry?

Em
Em
Guest
Reply to  Wendy
08/01/2019 11:27 pm

Yes!

Maria Rose
Maria Rose
Admin
07/28/2019 11:59 am

I’m thrilled that Kelly Bowen won, especially as she is a local author for me, and I’ve met her in person a few times (she’s lovely).

CategoryFan
CategoryFan
Guest
07/28/2019 11:54 am

Re: Teri Wilson’s book having only seven reviews: category readers generally do not write reviews for some reason. If that’s your criteria for picking up a category romance, you’re never going to try one. And that’s your loss as good category books deliver a quick, sharp jolt of pure romance in a short read. I haven’t read Teri Wilson but the lack of reviews is not a slight on her book.

@Dabney: HelenKay basically said that if the new rule changes – opening up the judges to beyond PAN, not forcing entrants to be judges, using a judge questionnaire and selecting judges from it – do not result in increased diversity among finalists, then yes, the contest will go away because it does not serve the whole community. They seem resistant to moving to a juried award ala the Edgar or to one where all members nominate books for consideration ala the Hugo. The contest will be limited to 1200 entrants. They didn’t announce any changes to the entry method aside from authors can only enter one book to begin, then more if the contest doesn’t fill, so I’m assuming it will remain first come, first entered and if you snooze you lose the opportunity to have your book considered.

Bunny Planet Babe
Bunny Planet Babe
Guest
Reply to  CategoryFan
07/28/2019 12:20 pm

I like category romances just fine. And a bunch of good ones–more highly ranked on Amazon and GR–were published in 2019. Some of the Tule titles and some of the other Harlequin categories have ten times more reviews.

NT
NT
Guest
Reply to  Bunny Planet Babe
07/29/2019 2:05 pm

I don’t always agree with the RITAs, but one of the very best things about it is that it offers an even playing field. Every book that is entered is read by 5 judges. The highest rated are named finalists, and those finalists are all read by five additional judges. The highest-rated book after the second round is named the winner. So yes, the book is a winner, because it was judged the same way every other entry was and ultimately received the highest score. Unlike other book prizes, it’s not a popularity contest where the biggest name and most popular authors are always going to win out. It’s a contest where more unknown authors–yes, even ones who don’t get a lot of reviews on Amazon–are given an equal chance with everyone else. And sometimes, when placed up against the more popular authors, those underdogs come out on top. I’m sorry you have a problem with that.

Suzanne
Suzanne
Guest
Reply to  NT
07/29/2019 9:51 pm

“One of the very best things about it is that it offers an even playing field”

I am going to vehemently disagree with that statement.

For, if it were a “level playing field” an Author of Colour would have won a RITA long before 2019; a certain Nazi romance would NEVER have made it passed the 1st, 2nd, 3rd round of judges to make to the finals of the RITAs; and LGBTQ+ romances also would never have been an issue for RWA PAN (published authors) judges, if it were a “level playing field”

NT
NT
Guest
Reply to  Suzanne
07/30/2019 10:41 am

First of all, there aren’t 3 round of judges. There are two–a preliminary round and a final round. I clearly stated that in my comment, but you were likely too busy getting vehement to read what I said.

Also, Kennedy Ryan is the first African-American author to win a RITA; she is not the first author of color. Tess Gerritsen, who is Asian, won for Romantic Suspense in 2001; Caridad Ferrer won in 2007. Still a very sad number.

That said, I was specifically addressing an even playing field between popular and less-known authors, which I believe the contest delivers as much as is possible. I almost noted that any contest will still be affected by the whims and prejudices of the judges, as is any contest judged by human beings. (Hell, Dimon’s statement on the RWA website even says, “one point every Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion (DEI) expert we consulted made was this: inherent bias is everywhere and in every contest.”) If you really wanted to call out the contest, you might have noted that the first African-American author to win a RITA did so…by writing white characters. As far as I can tell, a romance with Black characters, or Asian characters–Gerritsen’s protagonists were white–has yet to win.) It’s a twofold problem–there are substantially more romances by white authors and/or with white characters published every year than romances by authors of color, so the odds are already in their favor; plus, RWA as an organization is overwhelmingly white and straight, which means most of the judges will be too. But in terms of every book being given the chance to be entered and judged along with every other book in the contest, I think it offers as much of an even playing field as possible.

As for the Nazi romance, that was disgusting, but I don’t see how that was an issue of an uneven playing field. That’s an issue of a self-selecting audience. As I understand it, the Inspirational romance category usually has a hard time finding judges (the judges volunteer for the categories they want to read, presumably to ensure the books are read by people who are knowledgable about that subgenre and who like it, because I doubt either the authors or the judges would be happy to have people who are predisposed to dislike them forced to read the books). The people who volunteer to judge it are more likely to be white Christians who share that author’s worldview and are oblivious to the issues the same way she was. (And given that this discussion began with someone using the number of reviews to determine what should be a winner–the Nazi romance has 262 5-star reviews on Amazon; looking at the negative reviews, they only started appearing in mid-2015, once the Rita scandal broke. Clearly there are a lot of people who are the audience for that book who don’t get why it’s problematic–and those are the ones likely to be judging it in a contest.)

My own most hated example of a Rita finalist is Bowen and Kennedy’s HIM, a M/M romance that is a particularly offensive example of straight women fetishizing the lives of gay men to get their rocks off, oblivious to the homophobia in the text. That book didn’t just final–it won the award, but other than one review at Smart Bitches, I didn’t see anyone calling it out or being disgusted by the win. But I can accept that, for an award primarily judged by straight women, plenty of them wouldn’t see the same issues that I do, and still believe the award offers as much of an even playing field between popular and unheralded authors as anything can.

NT
NT
Guest
Reply to  Suzanne
07/30/2019 3:01 pm

Two corrections–M. Malone also won this year, so there were two Black authors finally winning Ritas. Like Ryan, she also won while writing white characters. The wait for a Rita winner with Black protagonists continues.

There was a novella a few years ago with an Asian-American heroine that won, but naturally she wasn’t paired with an Asian-American hero (because Asian characters are seldom paired together in romance, something that’s only just beginning to change). It was by a white author (natch).

Anon
Anon
Guest
Reply to  Suzanne
07/30/2019 3:53 pm

Wait, which Nazi romance pulled down a RITA nomination?

KristieJ
KristieJ
Guest
Reply to  Suzanne
08/01/2019 2:10 pm

I agree. The fact that is the first time an African American author has won a book is shameful. I was at RWA and sat in a workshop on diversity and more than one AOC said they don’t even submit books as they know going in they don’t stand a chance of winning so why waste their money. Hopefully the dam is broken now and AOC will have an even playing field now

NT
NT
Guest
Reply to  Suzanne
08/01/2019 8:49 pm

Two more corrections–I finally remembered that Sherry Thomas, who is Asian, has won two Ritas (by writing white characters). Also, Smart Bitches just mentioned The Moon in the Palace by Weina Dai Randel as one of its deals of the day. It won a Rita in the Mainstream Fiction category; both the author and the heroine are Chinese, though it’s not a romance novel. Just to give those authors their due.

For the anon who asked about the Nazi book, it’s For Such a Time by Kate Breslin, the story of a Jewish woman in WWII who falls in love with a Nazi officer. She redeems him (or some such nonsense) and also converts to Christianity in the end. If you do a Google search, plenty of articles about the outrage surrounding it being named a finalist that year should come up.

Caz Owens
Caz Owens
Editor
Reply to  NT
07/30/2019 6:04 am

I’m British and the RITAs are pretty much unknown over here. You could probably ask any romance reader in the UK if they’d heard of them, and I’d bet that 9 out of 10 would probably say no. The only reason I know what they are is because of my involvement with AAR.

I started with that because I wanted to make it clear that I’m not an expert on the RITAs and have little knowledge of how they work. But I DO know that authors/publishers have to PAY to enter books – which, to my mind, can’t possibly make it a level playing field.

NT
NT
Guest
Reply to  Caz Owens
07/30/2019 11:51 am

RWA is a nonprofit organization with a staff of 10 (according to their website), presumably not all of whom are dedicated to this contest. The entry fee pays for the contest. Every author has the opportunity to enter their books. Even authors who aren’t RWA members can enter. It looks like this year they’re changing it so that every author can only enter one book in the first week of the contest, and then can enter additional books if there is still room 7 days later, presumably to ensure as many authors who want to enter can. It looks like they’re capping it at 1200 entries, which means 1200 books that have to be divided among the available judges (I believe I heard each judge tends to get between 6 and 10 books) so that each is read and rated by five judges (they used to mail the books; it looks like they’ve finally moved to PDFs). Scores have to be tabulated, finalists have to be determined and those books redistributed to additional judges, there’s an awards ceremony and prizes. If you remove the entry and fee, who’s paying for all that?

Is there a way to make it more level? I’m not sure how. RWA used to have a Top 10 Favorite Romances of the year list in addition to the RITAs, where RWA members would vote for their favorite books of the year. Unsurprisingly, it was all the biggest name authors. If you have other people nominate books, won’t it just become a popularity contest again?

Inevitably, it seems like money is required for most awards. A few weeks ago when the Emmy nominations were announced, it was revealed that three of the actors from Game of Thrones who were nominated–Gwendoline Christie, Alfie Allen and Carice van Houten–had to enter their own names and pay their own entry fees, because HBO didn’t the way they did for most of the other main actors. (Or the infamous example of Katherine Heigl not bothering to submit her name one year for Grey’s Anatomy because she said she didn’t think she had strong enough material that season. Everyone got mad, but hey, it was her money.) For most of the movie awards, studios pay to send screeners to voters in hopes their films will be seen. I guess they could do that for the Ritas–the email addresses of all RWA members handed out so authors can send PDFs of all their books to their fellow members in hopes they’ll be read among the thousands of romance novels published each year and voted for. But it’s hard to believe most of those books would be read. At least in the current system, for all its flaws, the books are read and judged by at least five people.

Bunny Planet Babe
Bunny Planet Babe
Guest
Reply to  NT
07/30/2019 8:46 am

After reading more about this here, it looks to me like the current RITA system is better than most of the alternatives except that it shouldn’t be expensive to submit your book.

I have never read a book because it won a RITA. I read romance novels because of reviews and if the storyline looks fun.

Bunny Planet Babe
Bunny Planet Babe
Guest
07/28/2019 8:35 am

Are there fewer awards this year?

Caz Owens
Caz Owens
Editor
07/28/2019 7:28 am

Having looked at the list again… the Elizabeth Dyer book was good – I gave it 4 stars in audio – but I’m surprised it won a RITA. In my mind, the winners should all be outstanding and while Fearless was good, 4 stars isn’t outstanding. As for the Marie Tremayne… the less said about that the better. Is there an award for “most clichés used in a romance novel”? Because I could see it winning that…

BettyB
BettyB
Guest
07/28/2019 3:49 am

I loved A Duke in the Night by Kelly Bowen!

Bunny Planet Babe
Bunny Planet Babe
Guest
07/27/2019 10:17 pm

I have to say, if a book has just seven reviews on Amazon–the Wilson book–it’s hard to buy it was a winner.

Maria Rose
Maria Rose
Admin
Reply to  Bunny Planet Babe
07/28/2019 11:59 am

I find Harlequin series books are rarely reviewed on Amazon or on Goodreads for that matter. It’s a different audience that reads them, an audience that doesn’t write reviews.

seantheaussie
seantheaussie
Guest
07/27/2019 4:55 pm

I loved A Wicked Kind of Husband, but, it is almost cheating to have it win the Historical Romance award. The HR voters who prefer dramas would have split their votes while AWKoH, with a dearth of rivals, scooped up every romcom vote.

Caz Owens
Caz Owens
Editor
Reply to  seantheaussie
07/28/2019 6:56 pm

I’m not sure what you’re getting at…

Blackjack
Blackjack
Guest
07/27/2019 4:54 pm

Congratulations to all the winners. I think I read that this is the first time an African American author has won the best romance award? I have Kennedy Ryan’s book on my short list and hope to get to it this year.

I really liked Mia Vincy’s first book and am looking forward to the continuation of her series.

Em
Em
Guest
Reply to  Dabney Grinnan
07/27/2019 7:56 pm

She’s one of my favorite contemporary romance authors. New books (the POWER series) just around the corner!

Caz Owens
Caz Owens
Editor
07/27/2019 12:38 pm

I’m glad Mia Vincy won – A Wicked Kind of Husband was one of the best HRs last year and the award is well-deserved.

Em
Em
Guest
Reply to  Caz Owens
07/27/2019 7:54 pm

Ditto!!